DEFERRED was a bit too deferred - it allowed the dirty pages to be
written out to WAL before checking for violations, resulting in the
violations effectively being committed even though the transaction ended
up aborting
Closes#3784Closes#3785
DEFERRED was a bit too deferred - it allowed the dirty pages to be
written out to WAL before checking for violations, resulting in the
violations effectively being committed even though the transaction
ended up aborting
This adds a new fuzz test case to verify that any query returns the same
results with and without a rowid alias.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#2952
When a stress thread runs out of work, execute COMMIT and ignore the
result.
This prevents the currently extremely common scenario where:
- Thread x does BEGIN
- Thread x does e.g. INSERT ...
Then runs out of iterations and stops. No other threads can write
anything and they just wait for 5 seconds (busy timeout) and then try
again, forever.
Closes#3697Closes#3762
Without this change and running:
```
cd stress
while cargo run -- --nr-threads=4 -i 1000 --verbose --busy-timeout=0; do; done
```
I can produce a deadlock quite reliably.
With this change, I can't.
Even with 5 second busy timeout (the default), the run makes progress
although it is slow as hell because of the busy timeout.
Full disclosure: i couldn't figure out based on parking lot RwLock
semantics why this would fix it, so maybe it just lessens the
probability
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#3759
When a stress thread runs out of work, execute COMMIT and ignore
the result.
This prevents the currently extremely common scenario where:
- Thread x does BEGIN
- Thread x does e.g. INSERT ...
Then runs out of iterations and stops. No other threads can write
anything and they just wait for 5 seconds (busy timeout) and then
try again, forever.
Without this change and running:
```
cd stress
cargo run -- --nr-threads=4 -i 1000 --verbose --busy-timeout=0
```
I can produce a deadlock quite reliably.
With this change, I can't.
Even with 5 second busy timeout (the default), the run makes progress although it is slow as hell because of the busy timeout.
Closes#3748
Right now if any error happens during an interactive tx that causes the
`Transaction` to drop, the program will panic.
To prevent this, we store the `DropBehavior` of the transaction on the
`Connection` when it drops and issue the corresponding action (ROLLBACK
/ COMMIT / IGNORE / PANIC) the next time `Connection` is used to access
the database. This defaults to `IGNORE`.
I don't know how good this solution is, but we can at least prevent a
panic by storing whether the connection has a dangling transaction and
roll it back automatically the next time the connection tries to do
something.
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#3750
Rolling back a transaction on Error should result in
`connection.auto_commit` being set back to true.
Added a regression test for this where a UNIQUE constraint violation
rolls back the transaction and trying to COMMIT will fail.
Currently, our default conflict resolution strategy is ROLLBACK, which
ends the transaction. In SQLite, the default is ABORT, which rolls back
the current statement but allows the transaction to continue.
We should migrate to default ABORT once we support subtransactions.
Closes#3746
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#3747
