support the HAVING clause.
note that sqlite (and i think standard sql?) supports HAVING even
without GROUP BY, but `sqlite3-parser` doesn't.
also fixes some issues with the PartialOrd implementation of OwnedValue
and the implementations of `concat` and `round` which i discovered due
to my HAVING tcl tests failing
Closes#420
Implemeted checksums so that sqlite3 is able to read our WAL. This also
helps with future work on proper recovery of WAL.
Create some frames with CREATE TABLE and kill the process so that there
is no checkpoint.
```
Limbo v0.0.6
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
limbo> create table x(x);
limbo> [1] 15910 killed cargo run xlimbo.db
```
Now sqlite3 is able to recover from this WAL created in limbo:
```
sqlite3 xlimbo.db
SQLite version 3.43.2 2023-10-10 13:08:14
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
sqlite> .schema
CREATE TABLE x (x);
```
Closes#413
Hi all,
I attempted to implement the `order by desc`, which mainly consists of
the following two parts:
1. for cases where the primary key can be utilized, I implemented
`push_scan_direction` to push the scan direction down to the `Scan`.
2. for cases where the primary key cannot be utilized, I re-implemented
the sorting in `Sorter::rewind` based on whether it's desc or asc.
there is also some related work to be done, such as sort using secondary
index, I will attempt to do next.
Please help review this and let me know how I can improve it, thanks in
advance
Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@hotmail.com>
Closes#376
Implemeted checksums so that sqlite3 is able to read our WAL. This also
helps with future work on proper recovery of WAL.
Create some frames with CREATE TABLE and kill the process so that there
is no checkpoint.
```
Limbo v0.0.6
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
limbo> create table x(x);
limbo> [1] 15910 killed cargo run xlimbo.db
```
Now sqlite3 is able to recover from this WAL created in limbo:
```
sqlite3 xlimbo.db
SQLite version 3.43.2 2023-10-10 13:08:14
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
sqlite> .schema
CREATE TABLE x (x);
```
