Things that were just wrong:
1. No pages other than the root page were checked, because no looping
was done. Add a loop.
2. Rightmost child page was never added to page stack. Add it.
New integrity check features:
- Add overflow pages to stack as well
- Check that no page is referenced more than once in the tree
Closes#2781
Things that were just wrong:
1. No pages other than the root page were checked, because no looping
was done. Add a loop.
2. Rightmost child page was never added to page stack. Add it.
New integrity check features:
- Add overflow pages to stack as well
- Check that no page is referenced more than once in the tree
In addition to the existing `append_frame` which will write an individual frame
to the WAL, we add a method `append_frames_vectored` that takes N frames and the
db size which will need to be set for the last (commit) frame, and it
calculates the checksums and submits them as a single `pwritev` call,
reducing the number of syscalls needed for each write operation.
No need to pass `disable` flag to the `end_tx` method as it has that
info from connection itself
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#2777
- Transaction which was started with max_frame = 0 and
max_frame_read_lock_index = 0 can write to the WAL and in this case it
needs to read data back from WAL and not the DB file.
- Without cache spilling its hard to reproduce this issue for the turso-
db now, but I found this issue with sync-engine which do weird stuff
with the WAL which "simulates" cache spilling behaviour to some extent.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#2735
- transaction which was started with max_frame = 0 and max_frame_read_lock_index = 0
can write to the WAL and in this case it needs to read data back from WAL
- without cache spilling its hard to reproduce this issue for the turso-db now,
but I stumbled into this issue with sync-engine which do weird stuff with the WAL
which "simulates" cache spilling behaviour to some extent
Previously, the encryption module had hardcoded a lot of things. This
refactor makes it slightly nice and makes it configurable.
Right now cipher algorithm is assumed and hardcoded, I will make that
configurable in the upcoming PR
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#2722
This PR make it possible to do 2 pretty crazy things with turso-db:
1. Now we can mix WAL frames inserts with SQL execution within same
transaction. This will allow sync engine to execute rebase of local
changes within atomically over main database file (the operation first
require us to push new frames to physically revert local changes and
then we need to replay local logical changes on top of the modified DB
state)
2. Under `conn_raw_api` Cargo feature turso-db now expose method which
allow caller to specify WAL file path. This dangerous capability exposed
for sync-engine which maintain 2 databases: main one and "revert"-DB
which shares same DB file but has it's own separate WAL. As sync-engine
has full control over checkpoint - it can guarantee that DB file will be
consistent with both main and "revert" DB WALs.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#2716
This PR adds information about checkpoint sequence number to the WAL raw
API. Will be used in the sync engine.
Depends on the #2699
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#2707
Previously, we just hardcoded the reserved space with encryption flag.
This patch removes that and sets the reserved space if a key was
specified during a creation of db
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#2706
Previously, we just hardcoded the reserved space with encryption flag.
This patch removes that and sets the reserved space if a key was
specified during a creation of db