mirror of
https://github.com/0xb100d/manifestos.git
synced 2025-12-16 23:54:22 +01:00
Create brief history of egold - digital currency challenge
This commit is contained in:
344
brief history of egold - digital currency challenge
Normal file
344
brief history of egold - digital currency challenge
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
|
||||
E-gold
|
||||
Abstract: The e-gold system emerged in 1996. For the
|
||||
first time in modern history, this system, backed by gold,
|
||||
functioned completely independent of conventional
|
||||
banking institutions. The e-gold software guaranteed a
|
||||
secure and efficient method for transmitting value and
|
||||
maintaining records of payment transaction information.
|
||||
Each digital gram of e-gold was backed by one physical
|
||||
gram of pure gold bullion held offline. E-gold transactions
|
||||
were instantaneous, could not be reversed, and cost much
|
||||
less than traditional bank payments. Founders of e-gold
|
||||
sought to create a private gold-based monetary system that
|
||||
included Internet-based transactions which would perform
|
||||
better than national currency. The e-gold system was
|
||||
believed to be operating outside of existing Bank Secrecy
|
||||
Act regulations from 1996 until 2005.
|
||||
Mullan, Carl P. The Digital Currency Challenge:
|
||||
Shaping Online Payment Systems through US Financial
|
||||
Regulations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006.
|
||||
E-gold
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006
|
||||
The e-gold system was in operation more than a decade before the
|
||||
creation of Bitcoin and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that it
|
||||
was indeed possible to create and operate a popular digital financial
|
||||
system completely independent of conventional banking institutions.
|
||||
Dr. Douglas Jackson recently presented this e-gold innovations time
|
||||
line.
|
||||
1996
|
||||
e-gold.com online system was deployed in November.
|
||||
From day one, e-gold had the capability of using a numeraire for
|
||||
specification of a Spend amount that differed from that of the
|
||||
settlement currency. For instance, it was possible to order a Spend
|
||||
of $10 USD worth of e-gold. Calculation of the actual quantity
|
||||
to convey was made using table of reference exchange rates
|
||||
maintained by company (manually, every few minutes during the
|
||||
day, every hour or two overnight). Reference exchange rate and
|
||||
calculation were displayed on Spend Preview.
|
||||
Strong non-repudiation (finality of settlement) based on Real Time
|
||||
Gross Settlement (RTGS) and a strict debit rule.
|
||||
1997
|
||||
The Examiner was deployed on the e-gold website. This showed
|
||||
an unprecedented real-time indicator of e-metals in circulation
|
||||
(liabilities) and detailed inventory of the underlying assets backing
|
||||
them. The bullion reserves data could be drilled down to see
|
||||
unique details of each bar including vault location, serial number,
|
||||
refiner, purity, and fine weight.
|
||||
1998
|
||||
The Stats page was deployed showing details of system usage
|
||||
over previous 24-hour lookback period: it included the number
|
||||
of accounts, broken down by ranges of balance for each e-metal,
|
||||
and the number of spends, broken down by range of values and
|
||||
aggregated by range and total.
|
||||
2000
|
||||
The currency exchange was separated from the core
|
||||
function of issuance and settlement of Spends. A few
|
||||
months after this separation multiple independent
|
||||
providers had emerged offering services on a competitive
|
||||
basis, differing by currencies and payment methods
|
||||
The Digital Currency Challenge
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006
|
||||
supported, spreads, liquidity (size of exchanges supported and
|
||||
timeliness of execution).
|
||||
The shopping cart and automation interfaces were deployed, the
|
||||
former allowing specification of an incoming Spend, the latter
|
||||
automatic entry of an outbound Spend instruction.
|
||||
A Spend fee cap was implemented, initially at 50 cents US equivalent,
|
||||
which was later changed to 5 gold cents (0.05 g) for e-gold.
|
||||
2006
|
||||
A sheriff-bot was deployed to monitor Spends in real-time to detect
|
||||
transactions with indices of illicit activity. The value would be
|
||||
arrested once it had left the payer account and the recipient account
|
||||
would be frozen; both would then be flagged as to the nature of the
|
||||
suspected activity, making a permanent discoverable record and
|
||||
facilitating seizure or forfeiture. This became so sophisticated that
|
||||
there were instances where the first Spend to or from an account
|
||||
would trigger the bot, with hardly any false positives (and these
|
||||
could be released).1
|
||||
Not included in this timeline, but very important, is the fact that e-gold
|
||||
permitted mobile fund transfers back in 1999, seven years before PayPal’s
|
||||
commercial mobile payments.2
|
||||
E-gold was a secure account-based monetary payment system which
|
||||
enabled the use of gold as money. The e-gold software guaranteed a
|
||||
secure efficient method for transmitting value and maintaining records
|
||||
of payment transaction information. Dr. Douglas Jackson is well known
|
||||
for having designed and written much of the code himself. The system
|
||||
operated over the Internet on a global scale completely outside of conventional
|
||||
banking systems.
|
||||
e-gold.com was the classic model of a digital gold currency system
|
||||
from the past decade. It was also the very first digital gold currency
|
||||
to operate online for public use. Gold & Silver Reserve, Inc. (G&SR),
|
||||
a Delaware corporation, developed and deployed the e-gold payment
|
||||
system in 1996 and at that time administered both the payment settlement
|
||||
and the currency exchange. The company also served as bailee
|
||||
for the inventory of gold bullion and precious metal held in allocated
|
||||
storage by third-party custodians. The payment system and website
|
||||
were both administered by G&SR under the name e-gold. The software
|
||||
was designed to facilitate both local and global transactions with
|
||||
E-gold
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006
|
||||
the same payment convenience. G&SR also offered online e-silver,
|
||||
e-platinum, and e-palladium which all operated exactly like the digital
|
||||
gold currency. Every gram of digital metal, including gold, which
|
||||
circulated online was backed 100 percent, gram for gram, by physical
|
||||
precious metal. E-gold featured instantaneous settlement of all
|
||||
transactions at an extremely low cost. Unlike credit cards, payments
|
||||
across the e-gold system were impossible to reverse. Even in the case
|
||||
of a legitimate error, the payment remained in the receiver’s account.
|
||||
Consequently, merchants were happy to accept e-gold knowing that
|
||||
there was no charge back risk. The terms of use of the e-gold account
|
||||
very clearly stipulated that all “Spends” were final. In this respect, an
|
||||
e-gold transaction was very similar to a cash sale. In total contrast, a
|
||||
PayPal transfer is fully reversible and can be considered more like a
|
||||
credit card transaction.
|
||||
E-gold payments were highly divisible. G&SR’s computerized book
|
||||
entry system was organized using a transaction model that allowed
|
||||
payments as small as 0.0001 oz. Behind the customer interface, amounts
|
||||
of metal stored in the e-gold database tables were accurate to 15 digits.
|
||||
The recognized “Issuer” of the currency was e-gold Ltd., a Nevis W.I.
|
||||
Corporation. This offshore company was independently created to serve
|
||||
as the general contractor specifically responsible for the performance of
|
||||
the e-gold account user agreement. The e-metal system functioned to
|
||||
protect the online customer payment mechanism from the problems of
|
||||
conventional financial systems.
|
||||
All precious metal backing the digital currency was held by the e-gold
|
||||
Bullion Reserve Special Purpose Trust. This separate trust, which was
|
||||
formed and operated from Bermuda, existed for the purpose of collectively
|
||||
retaining all e-gold account holders’ bullion. After a few years
|
||||
of operation, all metal was held in the form of certified good delivery
|
||||
bars in allocated storage at repositories certified by the London Bullion
|
||||
Market Association.
|
||||
OmniPay was also owned and operated by Gold & Silver Reserve, Inc.
|
||||
It acted as the primary dealer of digital currency to the public marketplace.
|
||||
OmniPay was also the largest e-gold exchange operation in the
|
||||
world. The company exchanged national currency for digital currency,
|
||||
working between the issuer, e-gold Ltd., and all other third-party independent
|
||||
exchange agents. As primary dealer, OmniPay maintained both
|
||||
cash and digital currency liquidity at all times.
|
||||
The Digital Currency Challenge
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006
|
||||
As a move to further assure e-gold’s freedom from default risk and
|
||||
finality of settlement, the company structure changed in 2000 by
|
||||
separating the currency exchange business from the core functions of
|
||||
issuance and settlement of transactions. This move further dissociated
|
||||
the e-gold issuer from business risks relating to the exchange operations.
|
||||
Independent third-party exchange agents in various countries
|
||||
around the world performed transactions exchanging digital currency
|
||||
for national currency on behalf of retail customers. This retail customer
|
||||
group included additional third-party exchange agents. Since retail customer
|
||||
national currency transactions never occurred at the issuer’s level,
|
||||
in this classic model of a digital gold currency, the issuer e-gold Ltd. held
|
||||
no customer financial transaction records. All sales of digital metal from
|
||||
e-gold took place directly with OmniPay which in turn interacted with
|
||||
the public.
|
||||
While e-gold Ltd. maintained the online system, the company never
|
||||
accessed or handled any customer financial transactions. Financial
|
||||
transactions containing customer information were exclusively held
|
||||
by third-party agents. This helped e-gold to guard against the possible
|
||||
financial loss and risk which accompanies conventional bank products
|
||||
and practices. No financial transaction information on e-gold account
|
||||
holders, such as where a wire originated or the date on an outgoing
|
||||
check, was ever accessible to e-gold Ltd.
|
||||
An e-gold transaction, also known as a payment order, differed from
|
||||
bank-issued checks and credit card payments. A paper check is an order
|
||||
of withdrawal, which becomes a draft when endorsed by the recipient. A
|
||||
check pulls the payment from a bank account by someone other than the
|
||||
owner. Additionally, a credit card payment is the settlement of a prior
|
||||
approved amount withdrawn from the account by someone other than
|
||||
the account owner. Conventional bank products such as bank drafts
|
||||
and card payments both pull the payment from the user’s account. An
|
||||
e-gold payment did not work in this manner. It had to be pushed from
|
||||
the account by the account owner. No draft or prior approval could draw
|
||||
upon another person’s e-gold account. Only the e-gold account owner
|
||||
could initiate a payment which was also labeled a “spend.” This is an
|
||||
important distinction between e-gold transactions and conventional
|
||||
bank products.
|
||||
An Army veteran and graduate of Pennsylvania State University’s
|
||||
Medical School, in the mid 1990s, Dr. Douglas Jackson was a practicing
|
||||
oncologist in Melbourne, Florida. His career path and work
|
||||
E-gold
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006
|
||||
experience did not include any positions in banking or commercial credit.
|
||||
Dr. Douglas Jackson is a libertarian, a fan of the gold standard, and critical
|
||||
of conventional banking systems. A 1998 text from the e-gold website,
|
||||
which was composed by Dr. Jackson, reflects some of the reasoning and
|
||||
goals behind the creation of e-gold.
|
||||
The Gold & Silver Reserve is founded on the conviction that gold and
|
||||
silver are superior (in the long run) to fiat legal tender. We have developed
|
||||
the e-metal System of Indirect Exchange; a privately administered transnational
|
||||
monetary system. It combines the enduring value and desirable
|
||||
monetary characteristics of gold and silver with the robust efficiency of
|
||||
digital technology.3
|
||||
Further evidence of “why” Dr. Jackson created e-gold is found in a quote
|
||||
from a 2006 interview with Brian Grow for BusinessWeek Magazine.
|
||||
Dr. Jackson is quoted as saying he believed the e-gold system would
|
||||
“advance the material welfare of mankind.”4
|
||||
Today, with the e-gold
|
||||
system sidelined by US Regulations, Dr. Jackson confirms the quote
|
||||
was accurate but further describes his view from the early days of
|
||||
e-gold, “That element emphasizes the level playing field aspect of clear
|
||||
contractual constraints as opposed to a discretionary policy that leads to
|
||||
winners and losers.”5
|
||||
He further states,
|
||||
I started e-gold as the outgrowth of my own private study and interpretation
|
||||
of historical events. It appeared to me that many of the worst real world
|
||||
calamities, wars in particular, could be causally traced back to economic
|
||||
dislocations—booms and busts—that in turn could be traced to monetary
|
||||
manipulations. Over time, with discretionary control over monetary policy,
|
||||
such interventions—which were supposed to attenuate destructive excesses
|
||||
of credit cycles—ignited and amplified them instead. While there were
|
||||
some glimmers of a rule-based system with the classical gold standard it too
|
||||
was fatally flawed and certain to be abrogated when it proved inconvenient.
|
||||
The system I envisioned was informed by analysis of historic and contemporary
|
||||
models, one consistent flaw of all of them being the impracticability
|
||||
of binding a sovereign to inconvenient obligations. Even if a seemingly
|
||||
airtight system could be devised, a successor regime would have no qualms
|
||||
about repudiating it. The courts never award damages to those injured
|
||||
when a state reneges on its monetary obligations. Only a private enterprise
|
||||
can truly be held accountable to contracts of that nature.6
|
||||
The creation of the e-gold system was more than a new business or
|
||||
money-making venture for Douglas Jackson. He felt it was his role to
|
||||
The Digital Currency Challenge
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006
|
||||
release this digital currency system into the world. “The belief that it
|
||||
was now possible to develop and implement a system that could avoid
|
||||
the embedded flaws and contradictions which had undermined money
|
||||
since its earliest emergence carried with it a duty to try to accomplish
|
||||
it.”7
|
||||
Unlike the development of other digital currencies during that
|
||||
time, such as WebMoney Transfer which targeted specific demographic
|
||||
consumer markets, Dr. Jackson stated that e-gold’s global target market
|
||||
from day one was all “people who use money.”8
|
||||
E-gold was considered to
|
||||
be an alternative digital currency. The founders of e-gold sought to create
|
||||
a private gold-based monetary system that included Internet-based
|
||||
transactions which would perform better than national currency. This
|
||||
service was to be available for all users at every level of society around
|
||||
the world. The system operated as an alternative to national currency
|
||||
and was designed to directly compete with government-issued money.
|
||||
The term Better Money TM became a trademarked phrase featured on the
|
||||
website.
|
||||
Many digital gold currency and e-gold early adopters during the
|
||||
mid-to-late 1990s were advocates for a single gold standard currency.
|
||||
These users were often referred to as “Goldbugs” and viewed e-gold as
|
||||
a technically superior currency. They strongly believed that commodity
|
||||
money was a better solution than fiat currency. Other early users leaned
|
||||
toward laissez-faire economics and viewed e-gold as private competition
|
||||
for government money. People doing business with e-gold’s privately
|
||||
issued digital currency often viewed themselves as working to restore a
|
||||
natural economic system unrestricted by government. E-gold was seen
|
||||
as creating healthy competition in an otherwise government-controlled
|
||||
fiat currency world. Another segment of those early e-gold users was
|
||||
considered to be economic anarchists or those who believe in no government
|
||||
regulations. Today, some of the same groups using Bitcoin can
|
||||
be closely aligned with these original e-gold users.
|
||||
Until the mid-1990s, it was understood that banks had a tight control
|
||||
on the movement of funds around the world. During the 1990s, for
|
||||
anyone to stop using conventional banks and government-issued money
|
||||
in favor of a little known private digital gold currency circulating on
|
||||
the Internet required a strong personal conviction or an overwhelming
|
||||
desire to reform the monetary system. In all of these cases, during
|
||||
those early years, many e-gold users were viewed by the mainstream
|
||||
media as extreme. While much attention had been focused on e-gold
|
||||
early adopters, there were not many of them. Approximately two years
|
||||
E-gold
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006
|
||||
into operation, in April 1998, there were fewer than nine hundred active
|
||||
e-metal/e-gold accounts.9
|
||||
In late 1999, a new product came into the digital currency marketplace
|
||||
which can now be seen as a contributor to e-gold’s popularity and
|
||||
growth in the years 2000–2005. This product was known as a High Yield
|
||||
Investment Program or HYIP. In reality this type of investment program
|
||||
is simply a Ponzi scheme, but the widespread popularity of these
|
||||
schemes ballooned using the e-gold payment platform. Online High
|
||||
Yield Investment Programs were a force in the growth and popularity of
|
||||
digital currency and e-gold.
|
||||
In hindsight, it is important to review certain statements expressed
|
||||
by e-gold’s management in the early years of operation. Because
|
||||
e-gold’s technology was developed far ahead of present day US financial
|
||||
regulations, the e-gold operators had provided some disclaimers
|
||||
and offered their viewpoint regarding existing government regulations.
|
||||
Since the defining act of banking is to circulate more demand
|
||||
claims to cash than there is cash in the bank, the e-gold operators
|
||||
made it clear e-gold was not a bank. From the early years through
|
||||
2005, Gold & Silver Reserve highlighted this fact. In several instances
|
||||
of text which had appeared on the e-gold website in both the FAQs
|
||||
and Terms of Service, e-gold operators published statements describing
|
||||
how digital gold was different from a bank or bank deposit. It
|
||||
was their opinion at the time that by operating outside conventional
|
||||
banking the e-gold system remained outside of existing Bank Secrecy
|
||||
Act regulations. Here are some examples of this sentiment, from the
|
||||
e-gold.com website in June 1998:
|
||||
It is important to note the difference between a digital currency balance and
|
||||
a bank deposit balance. Deposits in a bank are regarded legally as loans to
|
||||
the bank. A bank is permitted to make investments (loans) using the money
|
||||
belonging to their depositors. Metal entrusted to G&SR is not a deposit at
|
||||
all: it is held as a bailment (like grain in a grain elevator). G&SR may not
|
||||
allow any encumbrance or lien to be placed on customer metal. G&SR is
|
||||
not borrowing it from you but rather safeguarding it for you for a fee. The
|
||||
banking system in general, operates on a fractional reserve basis. This is
|
||||
perfectly natural and legitimate for money in a savings account or time
|
||||
deposit. You, as an individual, may do what amounts to the same thing;
|
||||
borrow money from some people and use it to make loans to other people.
|
||||
In our view, however, “checkable deposit” is a contradiction in terms. It is
|
||||
just like in the old days when banks issued more banknotes (purportedly
|
||||
redeemable in precious metal coin) than they had coins to back. In contrast,
|
||||
The Digital Currency Challenge
|
||||
DOI: 10.1057/9781137382559.0006
|
||||
any metal entrusted to the Gold and Silver Reserve constitutes a spendable
|
||||
bailment—every gram of e-gold and the other e-metals is backed 100 by
|
||||
physical metal.10
|
||||
Found in both the e-gold user agreement and the Terms of Service for
|
||||
OmniPay, e-gold’s primary dealer, were statements that e-gold’s operation
|
||||
was not a bank and did not hold deposits for customers. From the
|
||||
December 2001 e-gold user agreement, this paragraph is found under
|
||||
section 2.
|
||||
Conditions of Use
|
||||
User acknowledges that (i) the e-gold service and Issuer are not a bank
|
||||
(ii) e-gold accounts are not insured by any government agency and (iii) the
|
||||
e-gold service and Issuer are not subject to banking regulations.11
|
||||
This statement is found in the Terms of Service for Omnipay from
|
||||
February 2003. “User acknowledges that G&SR is not a bank, is not
|
||||
subject to banking regulations and does not hold any value on account
|
||||
for User.”12 It is unfortunate that these types of declarations are still being
|
||||
made today by some new companies in the virtual currency arena. Under
|
||||
US regulations, today’s virtual currency transactions are considered to
|
||||
be very similar to e-gold payments. The business of exchanging or transmitting
|
||||
value online, whether backed by national currency, gold bullion,
|
||||
or considered a substitute for currency, is a regulated US activity.
|
||||
Notes
|
||||
D. Jackson (djackson@e-gold.com), 2013. E-gold History a Few More Questions.
|
||||
[email] Message to C. Mullan (carl@pdxcurrency.org). Sent September 15,
|
||||
2013.
|
||||
C. Mullan, 2006. E-gold Mobile Payments 7 Years Before PayPal? Available at:
|
||||
http://www.everyjoe.com/2006/10/29/work/e-gold-mobile-payments-7-yearsbefore-paypal-162/
|
||||
(accessed: December 13, 2013).
|
||||
Web.archive.org, 1998. Philosophy and Purpose. [online] Available at: https://
|
||||
web.archive.org/web/19980627133939/http://www.e-gold.com/unsecure/
|
||||
gsrvision.htm (accessed: December 13, 2013).
|
||||
B. Grow, 2006. Gold Rush. [online] Available at: http://www.businessweek.
|
||||
com/stories/2006–01-08/gold-rush (accessed: November 18, 2013).
|
||||
Jackson, E-gold History a Few More Questions.
|
||||
Ibid.
|
||||
Ibid.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user