The kata-agent binary won't be released, just built so it can be used,
later on, as part of our tests and as part of the rootfs build.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The kata-monitor tests is currently running as part of the Jenkins CI
with the following setups:
* Container Engines: CRI-O | containerd
* VMMs: QEMU
When using containerd, we're testing it with:
* Snapshotter: overlayfs | devmapper
We will stop running those tests on devmapper / overlayfs as that hardly
would get us a functionality issue.
Also, we're restricting this to run with the LTS version of containerd,
when containerd is used.
As it's known due to our GHA limitation, this is just a placeholder and
the tests will actually be added in the next iterations.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
To avoid the failure of not finding pandoc command this PR adds that
package as a dependency for static checks.
Fixes#8041
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
Seems like the static checks are failing due the missing of the hunspell
package this PR fixes that.
Fixes#8019
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
The test has been added to the repo, but we have to also add it to the
list of jobs to be executed.
Fixes: #8005
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's make sure we'll also be testing k8s using CRI-O.
For now, we'll only be running the CRI-O test with QEMU. Once it
becomes stable we can expand this to other Hypervisors as well.
Fixes: #8005
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We'll be testing kata-deploy with different kubernetes flavours as part
of our GARM tests, and this is a place-holder for this.
Once enabled, we'll do nothing, just `return 0`, so we can then properly
add the tests after this commit gets merged.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
So we have a better control on which flavour of kubernetes kata-deploy
is expected to be targetting.
This was also done as part of fa62a4c01b,
for the k8s tests.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Now that the static-checks job only takes care of running the
static-checks, let's clean it up, remove all the unneeded steps, make
sure that we're using the actions in their latest version, and have it
running in a cost free runner.
At some point I'd like to see those tests done in parallel, in the same
way that I've organised the build-checks, but that's something for
someone else, at some other time.
Fixes: #7974 -- part 0
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
With this we're removing the dragonball static-checks CI, as the test is
running here now. :-)
Fixes: #7974 -- part 0
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We're moving it out of the previous "static-checks" confusing matrix,
and adding it to the matrix that was currently being used for the `make
vendor` and `make check` checks.
This will allow us to have one job per component, and with that we can
easily run those in parallel and on the zero cost runners.
Fixes: #7974 -- part 0
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We're moving it out of the previous "static-checks" confusing matrix,
and adding it to the matrix that was currently being used for the `make
vendor` and `make check` checks.
This will allow us to have one job per component, and with that we can
easily run those in parallel and on the zero cost runners.
Fixes: #7974 -- part 0
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We're moving it out of the previous "static-checks" confusing matrix,
and adding it to the matrix that was currently being used for the `make
vendor` checks.
This will allow us to have one job per component, and with that we can
easily run those in parallel and on the zero cost runners.
Fixes: #7974 -- part 0
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Similarly to the static-check jobs, those jobs can be run on the zero
cost runners.
Fixes: #7974 -- part 0
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
It doesn't make sense to run this for all the bits of the matrix,
neither it's demanding enough to require running this in one of our
Azure sponsored runners.
Fixes: #7974 -- part 0
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let me start with a fair warning that this commit is hard to split into
different parts that could be easily tested (or not tested, just
ignored) without breaking pieces.
Now, about the commit itself, as we're on the run to reduce costs
related to our sponsorship on Azure, we can split the k8s tests we run
in 2 simple groups:
* Tests that can be run in the smaller Azure instance (D2s_v5)
* Tests that required the normal Azure instance (D4s_v5)
With this in mind, we're now passing to the tests which type of host
we're using, which allows us to select to run either one of the two
types of tests, or even both in case of running the tests on a baremetal
system.
Fixes: #7972
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We don't need to run on a D4s_v5. as those tests are not CPU / memory
intense. With this is mind, let's use a smaller version of the
instance, the D2s_v5 one.
Fixes: #7958
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We don't need to run on a D4s_v5. as those tests are not CPU / memory
intense. With this is mind, let's use a smaller version of the
instance, the D2s_v5 one.
Fixes: #7958
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We don't need to run on a D4s_v5. as those tests are not CPU / memory
intense. With this is mind, let's use a smaller version of the
instance, the D2s_v5 one.
Fixes: #7958
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We don't need to run on a D4s_v5. as those tests are not CPU / memory
intense. With this is mind, let's use a smaller version of the
instance, the D2s_v5 one.
Fixes: #7958
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We don't need to run on a D4s_v5. as those tests are not CPU / memory
intense. With this is mind, let's use a smaller version of the
instance, the D2s_v5 one.
Fixes: #7958
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We do the build of our artefacts inside a container image, and we need
to expose some env vars to the container so ORAS can be used there to
push the artefacts we want to cache to ghcr.io.
The env vars we're exposing are:
* ARTEFACT_REGISTRY: The registry where we're going to save the
artefacts.
* ARTEFACT_REGISTRY_USERNAME: The username to log in to the registry, as
ORAS does not use the same json file used by docker.
* ARTEFACT_REGISTRY_PASSWORD: The pasword to log in to the the registry,
as the ORAS does not use the same json file used by docker.
* TARGET_BRANCH: The target branch, which will be part of the tag of the
artefact, as we may end up caching the artefacts for both main and
stable branches.
Fixes: #7834 -- part 0
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Sometimes the test gets stuck running commands in the container - need to
investigate why later.
Signed-off-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@microsoft.com>
There's no reason to wait till the payload is created to run the tests,
as we rely on the tarball, not on the kata-deploy payload.
That was a mistake on my side, and that's already fixed for the nerdctl
tests.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's add a very basic sanity test to check that we can spawn a
containers using nerdctl + Kata Containers.
This will ensure that, at least, we don't regress to the point where
this feature doesn't work at all.
In the future, we should also test all the VMMs with devmapper, but
that's for a follow-up PR after this test is working as expected.
Fixes: #7911
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's add a very basic sanity test to check that we can spawn a
containers using docker + Kata Containers.
This will ensure that, at least, we don't regress to the point where
this feature doesn't work at all.
For now we're running this test against Cloud Hypervisor and QEMU only,
due to an already reported issue with dragonball:
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/7912
In the future, we should also test all the VMMs with devmapper, but
that's for a follow-up PR after this test is working as expected.
Fixes: #7910
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
As, regardless of what's mentioned in the documentation, it seems that
$GITHUB_REF_NAME is passed down as a literal string.
Fixes: #7414
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The ones for the payload-after-push.yamland ci-nightly.yaml are not that
much important right now, but they're needed for when we start running
those on stable branches as well.
The other ones were missed during
bd24afcf73.
Fixes: #7414
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We're changing what's been done as part of ac939c458c, as we've
notcied issues using `github.event.pull_request.merge_commit_sha`.
Basically, whenever a force-push would happen, the reference of
merge_commit_sha wouldn't be updated, leading us to test PRs with the
old code. :-/
In order to get the rebase properly working, we need to ensure we pull
the hash of the commit as part of checkout action, and ensure
fetch-depth is set to 0.
Fixes: #7414
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
That's what we've been using as part of Jenkins, so let's ensure things
will work as they did before, and only after that consider upgrading the
base OS used for the tests.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We've been using the `kata-deploy-tdx` target as that also uses k3s as
base, but it's better to just have a specific garm target.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
So we have a better control on which flavour of kubernetes kata-deploy
is expected to be targetting.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
GARM runners do not come with the whole set of tools we need, or are
used to when it comes to the GHA runners, so we need to manually install
bats on those.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's enable the devmapper kubernetes tests to match exactly what's been
tested as part of the Jenkins CI.
Fixes: #6542
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Previously, static-checks-dragonball is using machines from Alibaba
Cloud to run all the CI jobs.
Currently, we are going through an internal process to apply for the new
machines for Dragonball CI. Before the internal process is over, we will
temporarily use Azure VM to run static-checks-dragonball jobs.
fixes: #7838
Signed-off-by: Chao Wu <chaowu@linux.alibaba.com>
