11 KiB
DVMCP
Data Vending Machine Context Protocol
MCP Integration for Data Vending Machines
draft
This document defines how Data Vending Machines can expose Model Context Protocol (MCP) server capabilities through the Nostr network, enabling standardized access to computational tools for machines and humans.
Introduction
The Model Context Protocol provides a robust framework for exposing AI capabilities and tools, while Nostr's Data Vending Machines offer a decentralized marketplace for computational services. This document defines how to bridge these protocols, allowing MCP servers to advertise and provide their services through the Nostr network.
Motivation
While DVMs already provide a framework for computational services, and MCP offers a standardized way to expose AI capabilities, there hasn't been a standardized way to bridge these protocols. This specification aims to:
- Enable discovery of MCP services through Nostr's decentralized network
- Standardize how MCP tools can be exposed as DVM services
- Provide a consistent experience for users accessing AI capabilities
- Maintain compatibility with both protocols while preserving their security models
Protocol Overview
There are three main actors in this workflow:
- Service providers: Entities running MCP servers that expose tools and capabilities
- DVMs: Bridge components that translate between Nostr and MCP protocols
- Customers: Nostr clients that discover and utilize the exposed capabilities
The protocol consists of tree main phases:
- Tool Discovery: Finding available MCP-enabled, and retrieving available tools from them
- Job Execution: Requesting tool execution and receiving results
- Job Feedback: Handling payment and status updates
Event Kinds
This specification defines these event kinds:
| Kind | Description |
|---|---|
| 31990 | DVM Service Announcement (via NIP-89) |
| 5910 | DVM-MCP Bridge Requests |
| 6910 | DVM-MCP Bridge Responses |
| 7000 | Job Feedback |
Operations are differentiated using the c tag, which specifies the command being executed:
| Command Value | Type | Kind | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| list-tools | Request | 5910 | Request available tools catalog |
| list-tools-response | Response | 6910 | Returns available tools and their schemas |
| execute-tool | Request | 5910 | Request execution of a specific tool |
| execute-tool-response | Response | 6910 | Returns the results of tool execution |
Tool Discovery
DVMCP provides two methods for tool discovery:
- Discovery through NIP-89 announcements
- Direct discovery through NIP-90 requests
Clients MAY use either method or both depending on their needs. Each method has its own advantages and use cases.
Discovery via NIP-89 Announcements
You can query relays by creating a filter for events with kind 31990, and t tag mcp. DVMs SHOULD include their available tools directly in their kind:31990 announcement events. This enables immediate tool discovery and execution without requiring an additional request/response cycle. Here's an example of a complete announcement:
Example announcement:
{
"kind": 31990,
"pubkey": "<dvm-pubkey>",
"content": {
"name": "MCP Tools DVM",
"about": "AI and computational tools via MCP",
"tools": [
{
"name": "summarize",
"description": "Summarizes text input",
"inputSchema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"text": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Text to summarize"
}
}
}
}
]
},
"tags": [
["d", "<dvm-announcement/random-id>"],
["k", "5910"],
["capabilities", "mcp-1.0"],
["t", "mcp"],
["t", "summarize"],
["t", "translate"]
]
}
Tool Listing Content
Each tool in the tools array MUST include:
name: The unique identifier for the tooldescription: A brief description of the tool's functionalitytools: The tools present in the MCP server
Required Tags
d: A unique identifier for this announcement that should be maintained consistently for announcement updatesk: The event kind this DVM supports (5910 for MCP bridge requests)capabilities: Must include "mcp-1.0" to indicate MCP protocol supportt: Should include "mcp", and also tool names, to aid in discovery
Discovery via Direct Request
Following NIP-90's model, clients MAY discover tools by publishing a request event and receiving responses from available DVMs. This method allows for discovery of DVMs that may not publish NIP-89 announcements.
Another way to do discovery using the previous list tools request is to query relays with a filter for events with type 5910 and c tag list-tools-response.
List Tools Request
{
"kind": 5910,
"content": "",
"tags": [
["c", "list-tools"],
["output", "application/json"]
]
}
The request MAY include a p tag to target a specific provider:
["p", "<provider-pubkey>"]
List Tools Response
DVMs MUST respond with a kind 6910 event containing complete tool specifications:
{
"kind": 6910,
"content": {
"tools": [
{
"name": "<tool-name>",
"description": "<tool-description>",
"inputSchema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"text": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Input text to process",
"minLength": 1,
"maxLength": 10000
},
"max_tokens": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Maximum tokens to generate",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 2048
}
},
"required": ["text"],
"additionalProperties": false,
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
}
}
]
},
"tags": [
["c", "list-tools-response"],
["e", "<tool-discovery-req-event-id>"]
]
}
Implementation Requirements
DVMs MUST:
- Respond to list-tools requests with complete tool specifications
- Maintain consistency between NIP-89 listings (if published) and available tools
- Return appropriate error status if any tool becomes unavailable
Clients MUST:
- Obtain complete tool specifications before attempting tool execution
- Handle cases where tools may be unavailable or specifications may have changed
DVMs that publish NIP-89 announcements SHOULD:
- Keep announcements lightweight by omitting full schemas
- Maintain announcement accuracy by updating when tool availability changes
- Include all announced tools in list-tools responses
Job Execution
Tools are executed through request/response pairs using kinds 5910/6910.
Job Request
{
"kind": 5910,
"content": {
"name": "<tool-name>",
"parameters": {
"text": "The input text to be processed",
"max_tokens": 1024
}
},
"tags": [
["c", "execute-tool"],
["p", "<provider-pubkey>"],
["output", "application/json"]
]
}
The content object MUST include:
name: The name of the tool to executeparameters: An object matching the tool's inputSchema
The content object MAY include:
timeout: Maximum execution time in millisecondsmetadata: Additional execution context
Job Response
{
"kind": 6910,
"content": {
"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Primary response text"
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Secondary response text"
},
{
"type": "image/svg+xml",
"text": "<svg>...</svg>"
}
],
"isError": false,
"metadata": {
"processing_time": 1.23,
"token_count": 150
}
},
"tags": [
["c", "execute-tool-response"],
["e", "<job-request-id>"],
["status", "success"]
]
}
Job Feedback
Following NIP-90, DVMs use kind 7000 events to provide updates about job status and payment requirements:
{
"kind": 7000,
"content": "",
"tags": [
["status", "<status>", "<extra-info>"],
["amount", "<sat-amount>", "<optional-bolt11>"],
["e", "<job-request-id>", "<relay-hint>"],
["p", "<customer's-pubkey>"]
]
}
Status Values
The status tag MUST use one of these values:
payment-required: Payment needed before executionprocessing: Job is being processederror: Job failed to processsuccess: Job completed successfullypartial: Job partially completed
Payment Flow
A typical payment flow proceeds as follows:
- Client submits job request (kind:5910)
- DVM responds with payment requirement (kind:7000)
- Client pays the invoice
- DVM indicates processing (kind:7000)
- DVM returns results (kind:6910)
Error Handling
DVMs MUST handle both protocol and execution errors appropriately:
Protocol Errors
- Invalid request format
- Missing required parameters
- Parameter validation failures
- Unknown tool requests
Execution Errors
- MCP server connection failures
- Tool execution timeouts
- Resource exhaustion
- Internal errors
For any error, DVMs MUST:
- Send a kind:7000 event with status "error"
- Set isError=true in the kind:6910 response
- Include relevant error details
Complete Protocol Flow
sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Nostr Client
participant Relay as Nostr Relay
participant DVM as MCP-DVM Bridge
participant Server as MCP Server
rect rgb(240, 240, 240)
Note over Client,Server: Discovery Path A: NIP-89
Client->>Relay: Query kind:31990 (NIP-89)
Relay-->>Client: DVM handler info with tool listing
end
rect rgb(240, 240, 240)
Note over Client,Server: Discovery Path B: Direct Request
Client->>DVM: kind:5910, c:list-tools
DVM->>Server: Initialize + Get Tools
Server-->>DVM: Tool Definitions
DVM-->>Client: kind:6910, c:list-tools-response
end
Note over Client,Server: Tool Execution (Same for both paths)
Client->>DVM: kind:5910, c:execute-tool
DVM-->>Client: kind:7000 (payment-required)
Client->>DVM: Payment
DVM-->>Client: kind:7000 (processing)
DVM->>Server: Execute Tool
Server-->>DVM: Results
DVM-->>Client: kind:7000 (success)
DVM-->>Client: kind:6910, c:execute-tool-response
Future Extensions
Additional commands can be added to support new MCP capabilities by defining new values for the c tag. This allows the protocol to evolve without requiring new event kinds. Future commands might include:
- Resource operations (list-resources, read-resource, etc.)
- Prompt operations (list-prompts, execute-prompt, etc.)
- Advanced tool operations (cancel-execution, batch-execute, etc.)
All such extensions MUST maintain the request/response kind relationship defined in NIP-90 (response kind = request kind + 1000) and use kind:7000 for job feedback.