* feat(cdk): add Bolt12 mint quote subscription support
Extends subscription to handle Bolt12 payment method alongside existing Bolt11 support across wallet, mint, and CLI components.
* Add PostgreSQL support for mint and wallet
* Fixed bug to avoid empty calls `get_proofs_states`
* Fixed SQL bug
* Avoid redudant clone()
* Add more tests for the storage layer
* Minor enhacements
* Add a generic function to execute db operations
This function would log slow operations and log errors
* Provision a postgres db for tests
* Update deps for msrv
* Add postgres to pipeline
* feat: add psgl to example and docker
* feat: db url fmt
---------
Co-authored-by: thesimplekid <tsk@thesimplekid.com>
* feat: implement secondary repayment queue for any-amount invoices
- Keep original immediate payment behavior for ALL invoices (fixed and any-amount)
- Add secondary repayment queue that randomly repays any-amount invoices again
- Secondary repayments occur at random intervals between 30 seconds and 3 minutes
- Only any-amount invoices (amount=0) are added to secondary repayment queue
- Each any-amount invoice gets paid twice: once immediately, once from secondary queue
- Queue has configurable max size with LRU eviction policy
- Add comprehensive tests and update documentation
* test: add test for multiple payment verification
- Add test to verify that secondary repayment system creates multiple payments
- Test checks that immediate payment is received first
- Demonstrates the dual payment system working correctly
For bolt11 payments, enforce exact amount matching between outputs and quote.
For other payment methods, allow minting less than paid amount while preventing overspending.
The codebase was used to correctly perform signatory calls during a database
transaction, as the signatory was previously exclusively in process. However, a
few months ago, it was changed to be a trait that can be either local or
remote. Making external calls to services, adding latency, during an ongoing
database transaction is a bad idea because it will lock the rows until the
service call is finalized, which is unpredictable.
The issue is even worse in our pipeline where the SQLite storage driver is used
with the ":memory:" path, which forces the Database pool to have a size of 1.
Since our tests run in parallel, they would randomly fail.
This issue was failing in the CI, but the error was not making the pipeline
fail. This bug was fixed as well.
* feat: refresh keysets
* fix(cdk): resolve keyset counter skipping index 0 in deterministic secret generation
- Modified Database::get_keyset_counter to return u32 instead of Option<u32>
- Added database migrations to increment existing keyset counters by 1
- Removed counter increment logic from wallet operations to use actual counter value
- Ensures deterministic secret generation starts from index 0 instead of skipping it
The proof_writer implicit rollback on Drop is too slow for our tests causing
race conditions with Postgres.
This commit enhances the rollback logic and makes it explicit
These functions are designed as a single funnel to talk to the database,
whether it is synchronous or asynchronous.
This single funnel will log SQL queries and slow operations, providing a clear
and unified debug message for the problematic query, so it can be optimized
accordingly (for instance, missing indexes or unbound SQL requests).
* Working on a better database abstraction
After [this question in the chat](https://matrix.to/#/!oJFtttFHGfnTGrIjvD:matrix.cashu.space/$oJFtttFHGfnTGrIjvD:matrix.cashu.space/$I5ZtjJtBM0ctltThDYpoCwClZFlM6PHzf8q2Rjqmso8)
regarding a database transaction within the same function, I realized a few
design flaws in our SQL database abstraction, particularly regarding
transactions.
1. Our upper abstraction got it right, where a transaction is bound with `&mut
self`, so Rust knows how to handle its lifetime with' async/await'.
2. The raw database does not; instead, it returns &self, and beginning a
transaction takes &self as well, which is problematic for Rust, but that's not
all. It is fundamentally wrong. A transaction should take &mut self when
beginning a transaction, as that connection is bound to a transaction and
should not be returned to the pool. Currently, that responsibility lies with
the implementor. If a mistake is made, a transaction could be executed in two
or more connections.
3. The way a database is bound to our store layer is through a single struct,
which may or may not internally utilize our connection pool. This is also
another design flow, in this PR, a connection pool is owned, and to use a
connection, it should be requested, and that connection is reference with
mutable when beginning a transaction
* Improve the abstraction with fewer generics
As suggested by @thesimplekid
* Add BEGIN IMMEDIATE for SQLite
