Makes it easier to test the feature:
```
$ cargo run -- --experimental-indexes
Limbo v0.0.22
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
Connected to a transient in-memory database.
Use ".open FILENAME" to reopen on a persistent database
limbo> CREATE TABLE t(x);
limbo> CREATE INDEX t_idx ON t(x);
limbo> DROP INDEX t_idx;
```
Currently we have this:
program.alloc_cursor_id(Option<String>, CursorType)`
where the String is the table's name or alias ('users' or 'u' in
the query).
This is problematic because this can happen:
`SELECT * FROM t WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM t)`
There are two cursors, both with identifier 't'. This causes a bug
where the program will use the same cursor for both the main query
and the subquery, since they are keyed by 't'.
Instead introduce `CursorKey`, which is a combination of:
1. `TableInternalId`, and
2. index name (Option<String> -- in case of index cursors.
This should provide key uniqueness for cursors:
`SELECT * FROM t WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM t)`
here the first 't' will have a different `TableInternalId` than the
second `t`, so there is no clash.
This commit adds suport for DROP INDEX.
Bytecode produced by this commit differs from SQLITE's bytecode, main
reason we don't do autovacuum or repacking of pages like SQLITE does.
Closes#1280Closes#1444
This commit adds suport for DROP INDEX.
Bytecode produced by this commit differs from SQLITE's bytecode, main
reason we don't do autovacuum or repacking of pages like SQLITE does.
we had an incorrect optimization in `eliminate_orderby_like_groupby()`
where it could remove e.g. the first term of the ORDER BY if it matched
the first GROUP BY term and the result set was naturally ordered by that
term. this is invalid. see e.g.:
```sql
main branch - BAD: removes the `ORDER BY id` term because the results are naturally ordered by id.
However, this results in sorting the entire thing by last name only!
limbo> select id, last_name, count(1) from users GROUP BY 1,2 order by id, last_name desc limit 3;
┌──────┬───────────┬───────────┐
│ id │ last_name │ count (1) │
├──────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 6235 │ Zuniga │ 1 │
├──────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 8043 │ Zuniga │ 1 │
├──────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 944 │ Zimmerman │ 1 │
└──────┴───────────┴───────────┘
after fix - GOOD:
limbo> select id, last_name, count(1) from users GROUP BY 1,2 order by id, last_name desc limit 3;
┌────┬───────────┬───────────┐
│ id │ last_name │ count (1) │
├────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 1 │ Foster │ 1 │
├────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 2 │ Salazar │ 1 │
├────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 3 │ Perry │ 1 │
└────┴───────────┴───────────┘
I also refactored sorters to always use the ast `SortOrder` instead of boolean vectors, and use the `compare_immutable()` utility we use inside btrees too.
Closes#1365
Passing 1s and 0s with comments is not rustacean, and since we already follow the pattern of struct flags in other sections of the codebase it's better use it here too.
