This PR implements the `Sequence` and `SequenceTest` opcodes, although
does not yet add plumbing to emit the latter.
SQLite has two distinct mechanisms that determine the final row order
with aggregates:
Traversal order of GROUP BY, and ORDER BY tiebreaking. When ORDER BY
contains only aggregate expressions and/or constants, SQLite has no
extra tiebreak key, but when ORDER BY mixes aggregate and non-aggregate
terms, SQLite adds an implicit, stable row `sequence` so “ties” respect
the input order.
This PR also fixes an issue with a query like the following:
```sql
SELECT u.first_name, COUNT(*) AS c
FROM users u
JOIN orders o ON o.user_id = u.id
GROUP BY u.first_name
ORDER BY c DESC;
```
Because ORDER BY has only an aggregate (COUNT(*) DESC) and no non-
aggregate terms, SQLite traverses the group key (u.first_name) in DESC
order in this case, so ties on c naturally appear with group keys in
descending order.
Previously tursodb would return the group key sorted in ASC order,
because it was used in all cases as the default
Closes#3287
This solves an issue where an INSERT statement conflicts with
multiple indices. In that case, sqlite iterates the linked list
`pTab->pIndex` in order and handles the first conflict encountered.
The newest parsed index is always added to the head of the list.
To be compatible with this behavior, we also need to put the most
recently parsed index definition first in our indexes list for a given
table.
Previously we were rewriting/traversing the AST in a couple different
places, each of these added kinda ad-hoc as we needed them. This
attempts to do the binding of column references as well as the rewriting
of anonymous `Expr::Variable` -> `__param_N` that we use to maintain the
order of bound variables, also normalizes the Qualified Name's.
Also we previously weren't accepting Variable (or at least they wouldn't
work) in places like `LIMIT ? OFFSET ?`, which this PR adds.
I kinda want to keep refactoring translation a bit, and try to break
plan building up into more easy-to-digest chunks.. but I will resist the
urge right now as it's definitely not high priority pre-beta
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#3210
I don't want to even think about the complexity involved in making sure
that materialized views are still sane after the base table(s) are
altered.
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#3223
This PR improves the DBSP circuit so that it handles the JOIN operator.
The JOIN operator exposes a weakness of our current model: we usually
pass a list of columns between operators, and find the right column by
name when needed.
But with JOINs, many tables can have the same columns. The operators
will then find the wrong column (same name, different table), and
produce incorrect results.
To fix this, we must do two things:
1) Change the Logical Plan. It needs to track table provenance.
2) Fix the aggregators: it needs to operate on indexes, not names.
For the aggregators, note that table provenance is the wrong
abstraction. The aggregator is likely working with a logical table that
is the result of previous nodes in the circuit. So we just need to be
able to tell it which index in the column array it should use.
Our code for view needs to extract the list of columns used in the view.
We currently extract only from "the base table", but once we have joins,
we need a more complex structure, that keeps the mapping of
(tables, columns).
This actually affects both views and materialized views: for views, the
queries with joins work just fine, because views are just aliases for
a query. But the list of columns returned by pragma table_info on the
view is incorrect. We add a test to make sure it is fixed.
For materialized views, we add extensive tests to make sure that the
columns are extracted correctly.
Ongoing tests for [turso-go](https://github.com/tursodatabase/turso-go)
have unearthed a couple more issues
closes#3187
### Number 1:
We were getting something like:
```sql
sqlite_autoindex_`databases`_2
```
when creating autoindex for table in Gorm (gorm is notorious for
backticks everywhere), because of not normalizing the column name when
creating autoindex.
### Number 2:
When creating table with `PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT`, we were still
creating the index, but it wasn't properly handled in
`populate_indices`, because we are doing the following:
```rust
if column.primary_key && unique_set.is_primary_key {
if column.is_rowid_alias {
// rowid alias, no index needed
continue; // continues, but doesn't consume it..
}
```
So if we created such an index entry for the AUTOINCREMENT... we would
trip this:
```rust
assert!(automatic_indexes.is_empty(), "all automatic indexes parsed from sqlite_schema should have been consumed, but {} remain", automatic_indexes.len());
```
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#3186
This PR fixes bugs found in the [turso-
go](https://github.com/tursodatabase/turso-go) driver with UPSERT clause
earlier, where `Gorm` will (obviously) use Expr::Variable's as well as
use quotes for `Expr::Qualified` in the tail end of an UPSERT statement.
Example:
```sql
INSERT INTO users (a,b,c) VALUES (?,?,?) ON CONFLICT (`users`.`a`) DO UPDATE SET b = `excluded`.`b`, a = ?;
```
and previously we were not properly calling `rewrite_expr`, which was
not properly setting the anonymous `Expr::Variable` to `__param_N` named
parameter, so it would ignore it completely, then return the wrong # of
parameters.
Also, we didn't handle quoted "`excluded`.`x`", so it would panic in the
optimizer that Qualified should have been rewritten earlier.
Closes#3157
