Implement very basic views using DBSP
This is just the bare minimum that I needed to convince myself that this
approach will work. The only views that we support are slices of the
main table: no aggregations, no joins, no projections.
* drop view is implemented.
* view population is implemented.
* deletes, inserts and updates are implemented.
much like indexes before, a flag must be passed to enable views.
Closes#2530
This is just the bare minimum that I needed to convince myself that this
approach will work. The only views that we support are slices of the
main table: no aggregations, no joins, no projections.
drop view is implemented.
view population is implemented.
deletes, inserts and updates are implemented.
much like indexes before, a flag must be passed to enable views.
Closes#1967
To support this I had to change how we did `epilogue` similarly to how
SQLite does it. SQLIte first declares a `beginWriteOperation` when some
statement is going to necessitate a Write Transaction. And as we now
need to pass the current schema cookie to `epilogue` it was easier to
call epilogue only in one location (like we do with prologue), and just
have each statement declare their intentions separately. This allows us
to not have to pass the Schema around just to do the epilogue. I believe
this is something that @jussisaurio would be interested in.
~Also had to disable the MVCC test, as it was extremely buggy for me.~
Just disabled reprepare statements for MVCC
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#2214
`BTreeTable::to_sql` makes us incompatible with SQLite by losing e.g. the original whitespace provided during the CREATE TABLE command.
For now let's fix our tests by regex-replacing every CREATE TABLE in
the entire repo to have exactly 1 space after the table name in the
CREATE TABLE statement.
Fixes#2153.
Not so sure if SQLite doesn't rollback in more cases, we should
definitively check this out.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#2154
This PR updates to version Rust 1.88.0 ([Release
notes](https://releases.rs/docs/1.88.0/)) and fixes all the clippy
errors that come with the new Rust version.
This is possible in the latest Rust version:
```rust
if let Some(foo) = bar && foo.is_cool() {
...
}
```
There are three complications in the migration (so far):
- A BUNCH of Clippy warnings (mostly fixed in
https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/pull/1827)
- Windows cross compilation failed; linking `advapi32` on windows fixes
it
- Since Rust 1.87.0, advapi32 is not linked by default anymore
([Release notes](https://github.com/rust-
lang/rust/blob/master/RELEASES.md#compatibility-notes-1),
[PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138233))
- Rust is more strict with FFIs and aligning pointers now. CI checks
failed with error below
- Fixed in https://github.com/tursodatabase/turso/pull/2064
```
thread 'main' panicked at
core/ext/vtab_xconnect.rs:64:25:
misaligned pointer dereference: address must be
a multiple of 0x8 but is 0x7ffd9d901554
```
Closes#1807
We store `last_checksum` to do cumulative checksumming. After reading
wal for recovery, we didn't set last checksum properly in case there
were no frames so this cause us to not initialize last_checksum
properly.
`db_size` is `>0` in case of last frame written of a transaction. This
is necessary as we need to know -- while recovering wal contents -- that
we have read a transaction fully instead of treating every frame as its
own transaction.
Closes#1866
Makes it easier to test the feature:
```
$ cargo run -- --experimental-indexes
Limbo v0.0.22
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
Connected to a transient in-memory database.
Use ".open FILENAME" to reopen on a persistent database
limbo> CREATE TABLE t(x);
limbo> CREATE INDEX t_idx ON t(x);
limbo> DROP INDEX t_idx;
```
Previously we implemented update as a simple `Delete` + `Insert`
procedure which seemed okay for the moment but it wasn't. `Delete` can
trigger balance and a post balance `seek` which will leave cursor
pointing to an invalid page which `Insert` will try to insert to.
We solve this by removing `Delete` from the execution plan and rely on
`Insert` to properly overwrite the cell where the rowid is the same as
the one we are inserting.
