The `RowData` opcode is required to implement #1575.
I haven't found a ideal way to test this PR independently, but I
verified its functionality while working on #1575(to be committed soon),
and it performs effectively.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#1756
This PR adds support for the instruction `IntegrityCk` which performs an
integrity check on the contents of a single table. Next PR I will try to
implement the rest of the integrity check where we would check indexes
containt correct amount of data and some more.
<img width="1151" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-
attachments/assets/29d54148-55ba-480f-b972-e38587f0a483" />
Closes#1719
This PR adds support for table-valued functions for PRAGMAs (see the
[PRAGMA functions section](https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html)).
Additionally, it introduces built-in table-valued functions. I
considered using extensions for this, but there are several reasons in
favor of a dedicated mechanism:
* It simplifies the use of internal functions, structs, etc. For
example, when implementing `json_each` and `json_tree`, direct access to
internals was necessary:
https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/pull/1088
* It avoids FFI overhead. [Benchmarks](https://github.com/piotrrzysko/li
mbo/blob/pragma_vtabs_bench/core/benches/pragma_benchmarks.rs) on my
hardware show that `pragma_table_info()` implemented as an extension is
2.5× slower than the built-in version.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#1642
Found while fuzzing nested subqueries. Since subqueries result in nested
plans, it quickly revealed that there can be multiple `DeferredSeek`
instructions issued for different cursors, but our `ProgramState` only
supported one at a time.
Closes#1610
Currently we have this:
program.alloc_cursor_id(Option<String>, CursorType)`
where the String is the table's name or alias ('users' or 'u' in
the query).
This is problematic because this can happen:
`SELECT * FROM t WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM t)`
There are two cursors, both with identifier 't'. This causes a bug
where the program will use the same cursor for both the main query
and the subquery, since they are keyed by 't'.
Instead introduce `CursorKey`, which is a combination of:
1. `TableInternalId`, and
2. index name (Option<String> -- in case of index cursors.
This should provide key uniqueness for cursors:
`SELECT * FROM t WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM t)`
here the first 't' will have a different `TableInternalId` than the
second `t`, so there is no clash.
- Instead of using a confusing CheckpointStatus for many different things,
introduce the following statuses:
* PagerCacheflushStatus - cacheflush can result in either:
- the WAL being written to disk and fsynced
- but also a checkpoint to the main BD file, and fsyncing the main DB file
Reflect this in the type.
* WalFsyncStatus - previously CheckpointStatus was also used for this, even
though fsyncing the WAL doesn't checkpoint.
* CheckpointStatus/CheckpointResult is now used only for actual checkpointing.
- Rename HaltState to CommitState (program.halt_state -> program.commit_state)
- Make WAL a non-optional property in Pager
* This gets rid of a lot of if let Some(...) boilerplate
* For ephemeral indexes, provide a DummyWAL implementation that does nothing.
- Rename program.halt() to program.commit_txn()
- Add some documentation comments to structs and functions
The following code reproduces the leak, with memory usage increasing
over time:
```
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
let db = Builder::new_local(":memory:").build().await.unwrap();
let conn = db.connect().unwrap();
conn.execute("SELECT load_extension('./target/debug/liblimbo_series');", ())
.await
.unwrap();
loop {
conn.execute("SELECT * FROM generate_series(1,10,2);", ())
.await
.unwrap();
}
}
```
After switching to the system allocator, the leak becomes detectable
with Valgrind:
```
32,000 bytes in 1,000 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 24 of 24
at 0x538580F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:446)
by 0x62E15FA: alloc::alloc::alloc (alloc.rs:99)
by 0x62E172C: alloc::alloc::Global::alloc_impl (alloc.rs:192)
by 0x62E1530: allocate (alloc.rs:254)
by 0x62E1530: alloc::alloc::exchange_malloc (alloc.rs:349)
by 0x62E0271: new<limbo_series::GenerateSeriesCursor> (boxed.rs:257)
by 0x62E0271: open_GenerateSeriesVTab (lib.rs:19)
by 0x425D8FA: limbo_core::VirtualTable::open (lib.rs:732)
by 0x4285DDA: limbo_core::vdbe::execute::op_vopen (execute.rs:890)
by 0x42351E8: limbo_core::vdbe::Program::step (mod.rs:396)
by 0x425C638: limbo_core::Statement::step (lib.rs:610)
by 0x40DB238: limbo::Statement::execute::{{closure}} (lib.rs:181)
by 0x40D9EAF: limbo::Connection::execute::{{closure}} (lib.rs:109)
by 0x40D54A1: example::main::{{closure}} (example.rs:26)
```
Interestingly, when using mimalloc, neither Valgrind nor mimalloc’s
internal statistics report the leak.
DeleteState had a bit too many unnecessary states so I removed them.
Usually we care about having a different state when I/O is triggered
requiring a state to be stored for later.
Furthermore, there was a bug with op_idx_delete where if balance is
triggered, op_idx_delete wouldn't be re-entrant. So a state machine was
added to prevent that from happening.
closes#1186, or at least works towards it by implementing an actual
Plan for update queries instead of translating everything inline. This
allows for actually using index's, rewriting const expressions, pushing
predicates instead of hardcoding a full scan in the translation.
### TODOs:
1. `RETURNING` clause/result columns
2. `OFFSET` clauses
3. on conflict
### LIMIT:
By supporting `LIMIT` directly in update queries, we'll have to put the
tests outside of the compatibility tests, maybe in the CLI tests.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#1189
We never hit bugs due to these because of 1. not having multi column
indexes in our TCL test databases, 2. otherwise not really having Rust
tests involving indexes, and 3. `IdxLt` and `IdxLe` not actually being
used anywhere yet
Also as @PThorpe92 pointed out there are some nuances to the comparison
logic we may need to eventually implement regarding comparisons with
uneven number of keys:
https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite/blob/master/src/vdbeaux.c#L4719
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe (@PThorpe92)
Closes#1215
