Currently indexes are the bulk of the problem with `UPDATE` and
`DELETE`, while we work on fixing those it makes sense to disable
indexing since they are not stable. We want to try to make everything
else stable before we continue with indexing.
For example, implementing `SELECT DISTINCT` (#1517) and `UNION` (#1545)
require that we are able to create indexes without a rowid column
present. Similarly, `WITHOUT ROWID` tables require this.
I implemented this by replacing the `rowid` and `empty_record`
properties in `BtreeCursor` with
```rust
/// Whether the cursor is currently pointing to a record.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
enum CursorHasRecord {
Yes {
rowid: Option<u64>, // not all indexes and btrees have rowids, so this is optional.
},
No,
}
```
Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@homail.com>
Closes#1518
Previously the Operation enum consisted of:
- Operation::Scan
- Operation::Search
- Operation::Subquery
Which was always a dumb hack because what we really are doing is an
Operation::Scan on a "virtual"/"pseudo" table (overloaded names...)
derived from a subquery appearing in the FROM clause.
Hence, refactor the relevant data structures so that the Table enum now
contains a new variant:
Table::FromClauseSubquery
And the Operation enum only consists of Scan and Search.
```
SELECT * FROM (SELECT ...) sub;
-- the subquery here was previously interpreted as Operation::Subquery on a Table::Pseudo,
-- with a lot of special handling for Operation::Subquery in different code paths
-- now it's an Operation::Scan on a Table::FromClauseSubquery
```
No functional changes (intended, at least!)
Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@homail.com>
Closes#1529
Previously the Operation enum consisted of:
- Operation::Scan
- Operation::Search
- Operation::Subquery
Which was always a dumb hack because what we really are doing is
an Operation::Scan on a "virtual"/"pseudo" table (overloaded names...)
derived from a subquery appearing in the FROM clause.
Hence, refactor the relevant data structures so that the Table enum
now contains a new variant:
Table::FromClauseSubquery
And the Operation enum only consists of Scan and Search.
No functional changes (intended, at least!)
Primary keys that are marked as unique constraint, do not need to have
separate indexes, one is enough. In the case primary key is integer,
therefore rowid alias, we still need an index to satisfy unique
constraint.
This commit adds suport for DROP INDEX.
Bytecode produced by this commit differs from SQLITE's bytecode, main
reason we don't do autovacuum or repacking of pages like SQLITE does.
Closes#1280Closes#1444
This commit adds suport for DROP INDEX.
Bytecode produced by this commit differs from SQLITE's bytecode, main
reason we don't do autovacuum or repacking of pages like SQLITE does.
Apply affinities to a range of P2 registers starting with P1.
P4 is a string that is P2 characters long. The N-th character of the string indicates the column affinity that should be used for the N-th memory cell in the range.
This PR adds support for `DROP TABLE` and addresses issue
https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/issues/894
It depends on https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/pull/785 being
merged in because it requires the implementation of `free_page`.
EDIT: The PR above has been merged.
It adds the following:
* an implementation for the `DropTable` AST instruction via a method
called `translate_drop_table`
* a couple of new instructions - `Destroy` and `DropTable`. The former
is to modify physical b-tree pages and the latter is to modify in-memory
structures like the schema hash table.
* `btree_destroy` on `BTreeCursor` to walk the tree of pages for this
table and place it in free list.
* state machine traversal for both `btree_destroy` and
`clear_overflow_pages` to ensure performant, correct code.
* unit & tcl tests
* modifies the `Null` instruction to follow SQLite semantics and accept
a second register. It will set all registers in this range to null. This
is required for `DROP TABLE`.
The screenshots below have a comparison of the bytecodes generated via
SQLite & Limbo.
Limbo has the same instruction set except for the subroutines which
involve opening an ephemeral table, copying over the triggers from the
`sqlite_schema` table and then re-inserting them back into the
`sqlite_schema` table.
This is because `OpenEphemeral` is still a WIP and is being tracked at
https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/pull/768
Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@homail.com>
Closes#897
