- `OP_NewRowId` now generates new rowid semi randomly when the largest
rowid in the table is `i64::MAX`.
- Introduced new `LimboError` variant `DatabaseFull` to signify that
database might be full (SQLite behaves this way returning
`SQLITE_FULL`).
Now:
```SQL
turso> CREATE TABLE q(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
turso> INSERT INTO q VALUES (9223372036854775807, 1);
turso> INSERT INTO q(y) VALUES (2);
turso> INSERT INTO q(y) VALUES (3);
turso> SELECT * FROM q;
┌─────────────────────┬───┐
│ x │ y │
├─────────────────────┼───┤
│ 1841427626667347484 │ 2 │
├─────────────────────┼───┤
│ 4000338366725695791 │ 3 │
├─────────────────────┼───┤
│ 9223372036854775807 │ 1 │
└─────────────────────┴───┘
```
Fixes: https://github.com/tursodatabase/turso/issues/1977
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#1985
We're now mixing different error messages, which makes compatibility
testing pretty hard. Unify on a single, SQLite compatible error message
"no such table".
When an `UPDATE` statement modifies a table's `INTEGER PRIMARY KEY`
(which acts as a `rowid` alias) alongside other indexed columns, the
index entries were incorrectly retaining the old `rowid`. This led to
stale index references, causing subsequent queries to return incorrect
results.
This change ensures that when the `rowid` alias is part of the `SET`
clause in an `UPDATE` statement, the new `rowid` value is used for
generating and updating index records. This guarantees that all index
entries correctly point to the updated row, resolving the data
inconsistency.
Fixes#1897Closes#1916
When an `UPDATE` statement modifies a table's `INTEGER PRIMARY KEY` (which acts as a `rowid` alias) alongside other indexed columns, the index entries were incorrectly retaining the old `rowid`. This led to stale index references, causing subsequent queries to return incorrect results.
This change ensures that when the `rowid` alias is part of the `SET` clause in an `UPDATE` statement, the new `rowid` value is used for generating and updating index records. This guarantees that all index entries correctly point to the updated row, resolving the data inconsistency.
Closes#1888 . This PR fixes UPDATE translation by not emitting an
ephemeral plan when we are doing a `RowIdEq` search. Also, we should
delete the previous rowid when the rowid is in the set clause.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#1891
Previously, the `jump_if_condition_is_true` flag was not respected. As a
result, for expressions like <`ISNULL`/`NOTNULL`> `OR` <rhs>, the <rhs>
expression was evaluated even when the left-hand side was true, and its
value was incorrectly used as the final result.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#1846
Previously, the `jump_if_condition_is_true` flag was not respected. As a
result, for expressions like <`ISNULL`/`NOTNULL`> `OR` <rhs>, the <rhs>
expression was evaluated even when the left-hand side was true, and its
value was incorrectly used as the final result.