There is a distinction between tests that verify extension-specific
behavior and tests that verify interactions between the database engine
and extensions. Previously, both types of tests were kept in extensions.py.
With this new framework, we can extract the latter type of tests from
extensions.py into TCL. This cleans up extensions.py and provides
compatibility testing with SQLite at no extra cost.
To demonstrate the framework’s usage, tests verifying the handling of
virtual tables were extracted to TCL.
In the future, we may consider moving extension-specific tests to TCL as
well, especially those that have counterparts in SQLite or sqlean.
The `best_index` implementation now returns a ResultCode along with the
IndexInfo. This allows it to signal specific outcomes, such as errors or
constraint violations. This change aligns better with SQLite’s xBestIndex
contract, where cases like missing constraints or invalid combinations of
constraints must not result in a valid plan.
Additional changes:
- Update IndexInfo documentation to clarify that constraint_usages must
have exact 1:1 correspondence with input ConstraintInfo array. The code
translating constraints into VFilter arguments heavily relies on this.
- Fix best_index implementation in test extension to comply with new
validation requirements by returning usage entry for each constraint
`BTreeTable::to_sql` makes us incompatible with SQLite by losing e.g. the original whitespace provided during the CREATE TABLE command.
For now let's fix our tests by regex-replacing every CREATE TABLE in
the entire repo to have exactly 1 space after the table name in the
CREATE TABLE statement.
I keep having 3+ PR's in at the same time and always deal with crazy
conflicts because everything in the `ext` library is together in one
file.
This PR moves each category of extension into its own file, and
separates the `vfs` functionality in Core into the `ext/dynamic` module,
so that it can be more easily separated from wasm (or non feature =
"fs") targets to prevent build issues.
The only semantic changes made in this PR is the feature gating of vfs,
the rest is simply organizing and cleaning up imports.
Was unsure if `vfs` should be a feature on the `core` side too, or to
just enable it with the `fs` feature which seemed reasonable, as that
was already the current behavior. But let me know if we want it entirely
behind it's own feature.
Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@homail.com>
Closes#1124
