Also I added more tests for exec_add, exec_subtract, exec_multiply,
exec_divide, exec_remainder.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#1214
OwnedValue has become a powerhouse of madness, mainly because I decided
to do it like that when I first introduced AggContext. I decided it was
enough and I introduced a `Register` struct that contains `OwnedValue`,
`Record` and `Aggregation`, this way we don't use `OwnedValue` for
everything make everyone's life harder.
This is the next step towards making ImmutableRecords the default
because I want to remove unnecessary allocations. Right now we clone
OwnedValues when we generate a record more than needed.
```console
thread 'fuzz::tests::logical_expression_fuzz_run' panicked at tests\integration\fuzz\mod.rs:818:13:
assertion `left == right` failed: query: SELECT ( ( 3622873 || -8851250 ) * ( ( ( -124 ) + ( -5792536 ) ) ) ) = ( 179434259456392 < 65481085924370 ), limbo: [[Integer(1)]], sqlite: [[Integer(0)]]
left: [[Integer(1)]]
right: [[Integer(0)]]
```
This and a few other failing fuzzing tests were due to incorrectly
parsing numerics from strings. Some of our casting was done properly,
but it wasn't being applied to all cases where the behavior was needed.
It was also attempting to parse a string[0..N] N times until
`string[0..N].parse()` would no longer succeed. This searches for the
index of the first illegal character and parses the resulting slice
once.
Tests were added for some of the edgecases that were previously failing.
This PR also adds a macro in vdbe/insn.rs that allows for a bit of
cleanup and reduces some matching.
Closes#1053
This PR started out as one to improve the API of extensions but I ended
up building on top of this quite a bit and it just kept going. Sorry
this one is so large but there wasn't really a good stopping point, as
it kept leaving stuff in broken states.
**VCreate**: Support for `CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE t USING vtab_module`
**VUpdate**: Support for `INSERT` and `DELETE` methods on virtual
tables.
Sqlite uses `xUpdate` function with the `VUpdate` opcode to handle all
insert/update/delete functionality in virtual tables..
have to just document that:
```
if args[0] == NULL: INSERT args[1] the values in args[2..]
if args[1] == NULL: DELETE args[0]
if args[0] != NULL && len(args) > 2: Update values=args[2..] rowid=args[0]
```
I know I asked @jussisaurio on discord about this already, but it just
sucked so bad that I added some internal translation so we could expose
a [nice API](https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/pull/996/files#diff-
3e8f8a660b11786745b48b528222d11671e9f19fa00a032a4eefb5412e8200d1R54) and
handle the logic ourselves while keeping with sqlite's opcodes.
I'll change it back if I have to, I just thought it was genuinely awful
to have to rely on comments to explain all that to extension authors.
The included extension is not meant to be a legitimately useful one, it
is there for testing purposes. I did something similar in #960 using a
test extension, so I figure when they are both merged, I will go back
and combine them into one since you can do many kinds at once, and that
way it will reduce the amount of crates and therefore compile time.
1. Remaining opcodes.
2. `UPDATE` (when we support the syntax)
3. `xConnect` - expose API for a DB connection to a vtab so it can
perform arbitrary queries.
Closes#996
the command for drop table translation has been updated so that it more closely matches the semantics of SQLite's drop table command.
there are a few more things missing like ephemeral tables, destroy etc.
this is the initial commit is for the implementation of DROP TABLE. It adds support for the DROP TABLE instruction and adds a DropBTree instruction. It also implements the btree_drop method in btree.rs which makes use of free_page method which will be implemented via PR https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/pull/785
The main difference between = and != is how null values are handled.
SQLite passes a flag "NULLEQ" to Eq and Ne to disambiguate that.
In the presence of that flag, NULL = NULL.
Some prep work is done to make sure we can pass a flag instead of a
boolean to Eq and Ne. I looked into the bitflags crate but got a bit
scared with the list of dependencies.
Warning:
The following query produces a different result for Limbo:
```
select * from demo where value is null or id == 2;
```
I strongly suspect the issue is with the OR implementation, though. The
bytecode generated is quite different.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#847
The main difference between = and != is how null values are handled.
SQLite passes a flag "NULLEQ" to Eq and Ne to disambiguate that.
In the presence of that flag, NULL = NULL.
Some prep work is done to make sure we can pass a flag instead of a
boolean to Eq and Ne. I looked into the bitflags crate but got a bit
scared with the list of dependencies.
Take the logical OR of the values in register P1 and P2 and store the answer in register P3. If either P1 or P2 is nonzero (true) then the result is 1 (true) even if the other input is NULL. A NULL and false or two NULLs give a NULL output.
Take the logical AND of the values in registers P1 and P2 and write the result into register P3. If either P1 or P2 is 0 (false) then the result is 0 even if the other input is NULL. A NULL and true or two NULLs give a NULL output.
