I was planning on starting work on index insertion, but realized we need
to know whether our cursor refers to a table or an index etc., so it
resulted in this refactoring work.
- `cursor_ref` now contains what _type_ of cursor it is (table, index,
pseudo, sorter)
- `program.cursors` is now `program.btree_table_cursors`,
`program.btree_index_cursors` etc and they are unboxed because dynamic
dispatch is no longer necessary
- Cursor trait removed -- 95% of the shit was btree specific anyway, so
I just moved them to `BTreeCursor`. In certain instructions in the VDBE
we expect a btree cursor and in others we expect a pseudo/sorter etc,
lets make that explicit.
- I also removed `BTreeCursor::get_new_rowid()` specific tests that
required macros to generate a mock implementation of the `Cursor` trait
-- main reason is I couldn't figure out how to reimplement this without
the trait, and the second reason is that I don't think we really need
those tests, AND the proc macro is constantly failing in my editor as
well and screwing up `rust-analyzer`
Closes#655
TLDR: no need to call either of:
program.emit_insn_with_label_dependency() -> just call program.emit_insn()
program.defer_label_resolution() -> just call program.resolve_label()
Changes:
- make BranchOffset an explicit enum (Label, Offset, Placeholder)
- remove program.emit_insn_with_label_dependency() - label dependency is automatically detected
- for label to offset mapping, use a hashmap from label(negative i32) to offset (positive u32)
- resolve all labels in program.build()
- remove program.defer_label_resolution() - all labels are resolved in build()
This PR adds the `datetime` function, with all the support currently
that date/time have for modifiers, and `julianday` function, as well as
some additional modifiers for date/time/datetime.
There are a couple considerations here, I left a couple comments but
essentially there is going to have to be some more work done to track
the state of the expression during the application of modifiers, to
handle a bunch of edge-cases like re-applying the same timezone modifier
to itself, or converting an integer automatically assumed to be
julianday, into epoch, or `ceiling`/`floor` which will determine
relative addition of time in cases like
```
2024-01-31 +1 month = 2024-03-02
```
which was painful enough to get working to begin with.
I couldn't get the `julianday_converter` library to get the exact same
float precision as sqlite, so function is included that matches their
output, for some reason floating point math + `.floor()` would give the
correct result. They seem to 'round' to 8 decimal places, and I was able
to get this to work with the same output as sqlite, except in cases like
`2234.5`, in which case we return `2234.5000000` because of the `fmt`
precision:
```rust
pub fn exec_julianday(time_value: &OwnedValue) -> Result<String> {
let dt = parse_naive_date_time(time_value);
match dt {
// if we did something heinous like: parse::<f64>().unwrap().to_string()
// that would solve the precision issue, but dear lord...
Some(dt) => Ok(format!("{:.1$}", to_julian_day_exact(&dt), 8)),
None => Ok(String::new()),
}
}
```
Suggestions would be appreciated on the float precision issue.
Reviewed-by: Sonny <14060682+sonhmai@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#600
#525
- Adds the necessary `ScalarFunc` variants to support the `changes()` &
`total_changes()` SQLite function.
- Adds the necessary fields to the `Connection` struct to track changes.
- Modify the `InsertAwait` OpCode behaviour to affect the changes
counter.
Closes#589
Implements the `json_extract` function.
In the meantime, the json path has already been implemented by
@petersooley in https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/pull/555 which is
a requirement for `json_extract`.
However, this PR takes a different approach and parses the JSON path
using the JSON grammar, because there are a lot of quirks in how a JSON
`key` can look (see the JSON grammar in the Pest file).
The downside is that it allocates more memory than the current
implementation, but might be easier to maintain in the long run.
I included a lot of tests with some quirky behavior of the
`json_extract` (some of them still need some work). I also noticed that
these changed between sqlite versions (had `SQLite 3.43.2` locally and
`3.45` gave different results). Due to this, I'm not sure how much value
there is in trying to be fully compatible with SQLite. Perhaps the
approach taken by @petersooley solves 99% of use-cases?
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#524
