Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Glauber Costa
2627ad44de support union statements in the DBSP circuit compiler 2025-09-21 21:00:27 -03:00
Glauber Costa
e5a106d8d6 enable joins in IncrementalView 2025-09-19 03:59:28 -05:00
Glauber Costa
143c84c4e0 add tests for rollback of views. 2025-08-27 14:21:32 -05:00
Glauber Costa
097510216e implement the projector operator for DBSP
My goal with this patch is to be able to implement the ProjectOperator
for DBSP circuits using VDBE for expression evaluation.

*not* doing so is dangerous for the following reason: we will end up
with different, subtle, and incompatible behavior between SQLite
expressions if they are used in views versus outside of views.

In fact, even in our prototype had them: our projection tests, which
used to pass, were actually wrong =) (sqlite would return something
different if those functions were executed outside the view context)

For optimization reasons, we single out trivial expressions: they don't
have go through VDBE. Trivial expressions are expressions that only
involve Columns, Literals, and simple operators on elements of the same
type. Even type coercion takes this out of the realm of trivial.

Everything that is not trivial, is then translated with translate_expr -
in the same way SQLite will, and then compiled with VDBE.

We can, over time, make this process much better. There are essentially
infinite opportunities for optimization here. But for now, the main
warts are:
* VDBE execution needs a connection
* There is no good way in VDBE to pass parameters to a program.
* It is almost trivial to pollute the original connection. For example,
  we need to issue HALT for the program to stop, but seeing that halt
  will usually cause the program to try and halt the original program.

Subprograms, like the ones we use in triggers are a possible solution,
but they are much more expensive to execute, especially given that our
execution would essentially have to have a program with no other role
than to wrap the subprogram.

Therefore, what I am doing is:
* There is an in-memory database inside the projection operator (an
  obvious optimization is to share it with *all* projection operators).
* We obtain a connection to that database when the operator is created
* We use that connection to execute our VDBE, which offers a clean, safe
  and isolated way to execute the expression.
* We feed the values to the program manually by editing the registers
  directly.
2025-08-25 17:48:17 +03:00
Glauber Costa
7e76970035 fix: Handle fresh INSERTs in materialized view incremental maintenance
The op_insert function was incorrectly trying to capture an "old record"
for fresh INSERT operations when a table had dependent materialized views.
This caused a "Cannot delete: no current row" error because the cursor
wasn't positioned on any row for new inserts.

The issue was introduced in commit f38333b3 which refactored the state
machine for incremental view handling but didn't properly distinguish
between:
- Fresh INSERT operations (no old record exists)
- UPDATE operations without rowid change (old record should be captured)
- UPDATE operations with rowid change (already handled by DELETE)

This fix checks if cursor.rowid() returns a value before attempting to
capture the old record. If no row exists (fresh INSERT), we correctly
set old_record to None instead of erroring out.

I am also including tests to make sure this doesn't break. The reason I
didn't include tests earlier is that I didn't know it was possible to
run the tests under a flag. But in here, I am just adding the flag to
the execution script.
2025-08-13 06:41:14 -05:00