Improve serialization for DBSP views.
The serialization code was written organically, without much forward
thinking about stability as we evolved the table and operator format.
Now that this is done, we are at at point where we can actually make it
suck less and take a considerable step towards making this production
ready.
We also add a simple version check (in the table name, because that is
much easier than reading contents in parse_schema_row) to prevent views
to be used if we had to do anything to evolve the format of the circuit
(including the operators)
Closes#3351
Discovered this one while working on #3322
It was a bit more elusive because the original error was essentially a
red herring:
```
turso> CREATE INDEX idx ON "t t" (`a a`);
× unexpected token at SourceSpan { offset: SourceOffset(22), length: 1 }
╭────
1 │ CREATE INDEX idx ON "t t" (`a a`);
· ┬
· ╰── here
╰────
help: expected [TK_LP] but found TK_ID
```
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#3345
as we make changes to the way materialized views are generated (think
adding new operators, changing the id of existing operators, etc), we
will need to persist the topology of the circuit itself. This is a
change that I believe to be premature. For now, it is enough to reserve
the first operator id for it, and add a version number to the table
name. We can just detect that something changed, and ask the user to
drop the view. We can get away with it due to the fact that the views
are experimental.
We have used i64 before because that is the size of an integer in
SQLite. However, I believe that for large enough databases, the chances
of collision here are just too high. The effect of a collision is the
database silently returning incorrect data in the materialized view.
So now that everything else is working, we should move to i128.
The Materialized View code had custom serialization written so we could
move this code forward. Now that we have many operators and the views
work, replace it with something saner.
The main insight is that if we transform the AggregateState into Values
before the serialization, we are able to just use standard SQLite
serialization for the values. We then just have to add sizes, codes for
the functions, etc (which are also represented as Values).
This PR implements the `json_tree` table-valued function.
It's not 100% compatible with SQLite, because SQLite does some iffy
things with the `key` and `path` columns. I started a
[thread](https://www.sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/48f5763d8c) on their
forum and I linked it to the disabled tests in `json.test`.
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#3256
fixes#1976
and #1605
```zsh
turso> DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t;
CREATE TABLE t (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
name TEXT
);
turso> INSERT INTO t (name) VALUES ('A'); SELECT * FROM sqlite_sequence;
┌──────┬─────┐
│ name │ seq │
├──────┼─────┤
│ t │ 1 │
└──────┴─────┘
turso> DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t;
CREATE TABLE t (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
name TEXT
);
turso> INSERT INTO t (name) VALUES ('A'); SELECT * FROM sqlite_sequence;
┌──────┬─────┐
│ name │ seq │
├──────┼─────┤
│ t │ 1 │
└──────┴─────┘
turso> INSERT INTO t (name) VALUES ('A'); SELECT * FROM sqlite_sequence;
┌──────┬─────┐
│ name │ seq │
├──────┼─────┤
│ t │ 2 │
└──────┴─────┘
turso>
```
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#2983
we haven't really tested this at all, and it clearly doesn't work, as
per #3315.
best to disable it for the time being, especially since vanilla SQLite
doesn't support this syntax unless you compile it with a flag.
Closes#3337
This PR makes all JS db packages to have uniform interface: `new
Database(...)` constructor with explicit `connect()` and `close()`
methods.
Also, this PR adds docstrings in the code and properly support few
better-sqlite options (readonly, fileMustExist, timeout)
Closes#3334
## Description
Read transactions from logical log and load mvcc store based on the
contents onto transaction 0, which is the special transaction where we
will load all row versions that can be read by all new transactions.
## Todo
- [x] Testing for multiple transactions
- [ ] Lock multiple loading of same logical-log at the same time
- [x] Add column_count to format because if not it is hard to judge from
record alone.
- [x] Trim buffer read
I was thinking to implement the rest on another pr to not increase load
to review this one.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#3323
Changes ALTER TABLE operations to use only MV store and not go through
pager, because pager is only used during checkpoint.
- Exclusive transaction is required for DDL operations: trying to
execute one inside a `BEGIN CONCURRENT` transaction will return an
error. It's simply too complicated for now to try to make them
concurrently transactional.
- Not doing schema changes via pager means that in MV rollback, the
connection must rollback its private schema separately, since pager
rollback is not invoked.
- To simplify MVCC semantics, if any transaction committed a schema
change after a transaction started, it cannot commit and will abort with
`SchemaUpdated` error
- To mimic regular SQLite transaction behavior, if a transaction tries
to promote to exclusive transaction, it will fail with `Busy` error if
there were any committed transactions after the read transaction
started.
Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@homail.com>
Closes#3333
