MVCC does currently not support indexes. Therefore,
- Fail if a database with indexes is opened with MVCC
- Disallow `CREATE INDEX` when MVCC is enabled
Fixes: #3108Closes#3426
MVCC does currently not support indexes. Therefore,
- Fail if a database with indexes is opened with MVCC
- Disallow `CREATE INDEX` when MVCC is enabled
Fixes: #3108
This PR moves part of string normalization to the parser layer.
Now, we dequote and unescape values in the parser, but we still need to
lowercase them for proper ignore-case comparison logic in the planner.
The reason to not lowercase in the parser is following:
1. SQLite (and tursodb) have ident->string conversion rule and by
lowercasing value early we will loose original representation
2. Some things like column names are preserve the case right now and we
better to not change this behaviour.
Closes#3344
- before, we validated that condition during program emit - which works for fixed values of parameters but doesn't work with variables provided externally to the prepared statement
closes#3282
includes minor refactor, removing `column_is_rowid_alias`, which is only
checking the public field of the argument Column.
Reviewed-by: Jussi Saurio <jussi.saurio@gmail.com>
Closes#3385
We had code for this, but the code had a fatal flaw: it tried to detect
a complex operation (an operation that needs projection), and return
false (no need for projection), for the others.
This is the exact opposite of what we should do: we should identify the
*simple* operations, and then return true (needs projection) for the
rest.
CAST is a special beast, since it is not a function, but rather, a
special opcode. Everything else above is the true just the same. But for
CAST, we have to do the extra work to capture it in the logical plan and
pass it down.
Fixes#3372Fixes#3370Fixes#3369
Improve serialization for DBSP views.
The serialization code was written organically, without much forward
thinking about stability as we evolved the table and operator format.
Now that this is done, we are at at point where we can actually make it
suck less and take a considerable step towards making this production
ready.
We also add a simple version check (in the table name, because that is
much easier than reading contents in parse_schema_row) to prevent views
to be used if we had to do anything to evolve the format of the circuit
(including the operators)
Closes#3351
Discovered this one while working on #3322
It was a bit more elusive because the original error was essentially a
red herring:
```
turso> CREATE INDEX idx ON "t t" (`a a`);
× unexpected token at SourceSpan { offset: SourceOffset(22), length: 1 }
╭────
1 │ CREATE INDEX idx ON "t t" (`a a`);
· ┬
· ╰── here
╰────
help: expected [TK_LP] but found TK_ID
```
Reviewed-by: Preston Thorpe <preston@turso.tech>
Closes#3345
as we make changes to the way materialized views are generated (think
adding new operators, changing the id of existing operators, etc), we
will need to persist the topology of the circuit itself. This is a
change that I believe to be premature. For now, it is enough to reserve
the first operator id for it, and add a version number to the table
name. We can just detect that something changed, and ask the user to
drop the view. We can get away with it due to the fact that the views
are experimental.
We have used i64 before because that is the size of an integer in
SQLite. However, I believe that for large enough databases, the chances
of collision here are just too high. The effect of a collision is the
database silently returning incorrect data in the materialized view.
So now that everything else is working, we should move to i128.
