Makes it easier to test the feature:
```
$ cargo run -- --experimental-indexes
Limbo v0.0.22
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
Connected to a transient in-memory database.
Use ".open FILENAME" to reopen on a persistent database
limbo> CREATE TABLE t(x);
limbo> CREATE INDEX t_idx ON t(x);
limbo> DROP INDEX t_idx;
```
Currently our "table id"/"table no"/"table idx" references always
use the direct index of the `TableReference` in the plan, e.g. in
`SelectPlan::table_references`. For example:
```rust
Expr::Column { table: 0, column: 3, .. }
```
refers to the 0'th table in the `table_references` list.
This is a fragile approach because it assumes the table_references
list is stable for the lifetime of the query processing. This has so
far been the case, but there exist certain query transformations,
e.g. subquery unnesting, that may fold new table references from
a subquery (which has its own table ref list) into the table reference
list of the parent.
If such a transformation is made, then potentially all of the Expr::Column
references to tables will become invalid. Consider this example:
```sql
-- Assume tables: users(id, age), orders(user_id, amount)
-- Get total amount spent per user on orders over $100
SELECT u.id, sub.total
FROM users u JOIN
(SELECT user_id, SUM(amount) as total
FROM orders o
WHERE o.amount > 100
GROUP BY o.user_id) sub
WHERE u.id = sub.user_id
-- Before subquery unnesting:
-- Main query table_references: [users, sub]
-- u.id refers to table 0, column 0
-- sub.total refers to table 1, column 1
--
-- Subquery table_references: [orders]
-- o.user_id refers to table 0, column 0
-- o.amount refers to table 0, column 1
--
-- After unnesting and folding subquery tables into main query,
-- the query might look like this:
SELECT u.id, SUM(o.amount) as total
FROM users u JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id
WHERE o.amount > 100
GROUP BY u.id;
-- Main query table_references: [users, orders]
-- u.id refers to table index 0 (correct)
-- o.amount refers to table index 0 (incorrect, should be 1)
-- o.user_id refers to table index 0 (incorrect, should be 1)
```
We could ofc traverse every expression in the subquery and rewrite
the table indexes to be correct, but if we instead use stable identifiers
for each table reference, then all the column references will continue
to be correct.
Hence, this PR introduces a `TableInternalId` used in `TableReference`
as well as `Expr::Column` and `Expr::Rowid` so that this kind of query
transformations can happen with less pain.
Previously the Operation enum consisted of:
- Operation::Scan
- Operation::Search
- Operation::Subquery
Which was always a dumb hack because what we really are doing is an
Operation::Scan on a "virtual"/"pseudo" table (overloaded names...)
derived from a subquery appearing in the FROM clause.
Hence, refactor the relevant data structures so that the Table enum now
contains a new variant:
Table::FromClauseSubquery
And the Operation enum only consists of Scan and Search.
```
SELECT * FROM (SELECT ...) sub;
-- the subquery here was previously interpreted as Operation::Subquery on a Table::Pseudo,
-- with a lot of special handling for Operation::Subquery in different code paths
-- now it's an Operation::Scan on a Table::FromClauseSubquery
```
No functional changes (intended, at least!)
Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@homail.com>
Closes#1529
Previously the Operation enum consisted of:
- Operation::Scan
- Operation::Search
- Operation::Subquery
Which was always a dumb hack because what we really are doing is
an Operation::Scan on a "virtual"/"pseudo" table (overloaded names...)
derived from a subquery appearing in the FROM clause.
Hence, refactor the relevant data structures so that the Table enum
now contains a new variant:
Table::FromClauseSubquery
And the Operation enum only consists of Scan and Search.
No functional changes (intended, at least!)
Adds initial limited support for CTEs.
- No MATERIALIZED
- No RECURSIVE
- No named CTE columns
- Only SELECT statements supported inside CTE
Basically this kind of WITH clause can just be rewritten as a subquery,
so this PR adds some plumbing to rewrite them using the existing
subquery machinery.
It also introduces the concept of a `Scope` where a child query can
refer to its parent, useful for CTEs like:
```
do_execsql_test nested-subquery-cte {
with nested_sub as (
select concat(name, '!!!') as loud_hat
from products where name = 'hat'
),
sub as (
select upper(nested_sub.loud_hat) as loudest_hat from nested_sub
)
select sub.loudest_hat from sub;
} {HAT!!!}
```
I think we need to expand the use of `Scope` to all of our identifier
resolutions (currently we don't explicitly have logic for determining
what a given query can see), but I didn't want to bloat the PR too much.
Hence, this implementation is probably full of all sorts of bugs, but
I've added equivalent tests for ALL the existing subquery tests,
rewritten in CTE form.
Closes#920
Use knowledge of query plan to inform how much memory to initially
allocate for `ProgramBuilder` vectors
Some of them are exact, some are semi-random estimates
```sql
Prepare `SELECT 1`/Limbo/SELECT 1
time: [756.93 ns 758.11 ns 759.59 ns]
change: [-4.5974% -4.3153% -4.0393%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
2 (2.00%) low severe
1 (1.00%) low mild
3 (3.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
Prepare `SELECT * FROM users LIMIT 1`/Limbo/SELECT * FROM users LIMIT 1
time: [1.4739 µs 1.4769 µs 1.4800 µs]
change: [-7.9364% -7.7171% -7.4979%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
Prepare `SELECT first_name, count(1) FROM users GROUP BY first_name HAVING count(1) > 1 ORDER BY cou...`
time: [3.7440 µs 3.7520 µs 3.7596 µs]
change: [-5.4627% -5.1578% -4.8445%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high severe
```
Closes#899
