- `Update` query doesn't update `n_changes`. Let's make it work
- Add `InsertFlags` to add meta information related to insert operations
- For update query, add `UPDATE` flag
- Currently, the update query executes `Insn::Delete` and `Insn::Insert`
internally, it increases `n_change` by 2. So, for the update query,
let's skip increasing `n_change` for the `Insn::Insert`
https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo/issues/1681
Reviewed-by: Pere Diaz Bou <pere-altea@homail.com>
Closes#1683
This PR adds support for the instruction `IntegrityCk` which performs an
integrity check on the contents of a single table. Next PR I will try to
implement the rest of the integrity check where we would check indexes
containt correct amount of data and some more.
<img width="1151" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-
attachments/assets/29d54148-55ba-480f-b972-e38587f0a483" />
Closes#1719
This commit introduces AUTOVACUUM to Limbo. It introduces the concept of ptrmap pages and also adds some additional instructions that are required to make AUTOVACUUM PRAGMA work
1. allow calling op_null with Insn::BeginSubrtn
- BeginSubrtn is identical to Null, but named differently so that
its use in context is clearer
2. Insn::Return: add possibility to fallthrough on non-integer values as
per sqlite spec
Closes#1588
Reviewable commit by commit. CI failures are not related.
Adds support for e.g. `select first_name, sum(distinct age),
count(distinct age), avg(distinct age) from users group by 1`
Implementation details:
- Creates an ephemeral index per distinct aggregate, and jumps over the
accumulation step if a duplicate is found
Closes#1507
This commit adds suport for DROP INDEX.
Bytecode produced by this commit differs from SQLITE's bytecode, main
reason we don't do autovacuum or repacking of pages like SQLITE does.
Closes#1280Closes#1444
This commit adds suport for DROP INDEX.
Bytecode produced by this commit differs from SQLITE's bytecode, main
reason we don't do autovacuum or repacking of pages like SQLITE does.
we had an incorrect optimization in `eliminate_orderby_like_groupby()`
where it could remove e.g. the first term of the ORDER BY if it matched
the first GROUP BY term and the result set was naturally ordered by that
term. this is invalid. see e.g.:
```sql
main branch - BAD: removes the `ORDER BY id` term because the results are naturally ordered by id.
However, this results in sorting the entire thing by last name only!
limbo> select id, last_name, count(1) from users GROUP BY 1,2 order by id, last_name desc limit 3;
┌──────┬───────────┬───────────┐
│ id │ last_name │ count (1) │
├──────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 6235 │ Zuniga │ 1 │
├──────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 8043 │ Zuniga │ 1 │
├──────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 944 │ Zimmerman │ 1 │
└──────┴───────────┴───────────┘
after fix - GOOD:
limbo> select id, last_name, count(1) from users GROUP BY 1,2 order by id, last_name desc limit 3;
┌────┬───────────┬───────────┐
│ id │ last_name │ count (1) │
├────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 1 │ Foster │ 1 │
├────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 2 │ Salazar │ 1 │
├────┼───────────┼───────────┤
│ 3 │ Perry │ 1 │
└────┴───────────┴───────────┘
I also refactored sorters to always use the ast `SortOrder` instead of boolean vectors, and use the `compare_immutable()` utility we use inside btrees too.
Closes#1365
Previously `DELETE FROM ...` only emitted deletes for main table, but
this is incorrect as we want to remove entries from index tables as
well.
Closes#1383
Apply affinities to a range of P2 registers starting with P1.
P4 is a string that is P2 characters long. The N-th character of the string indicates the column affinity that should be used for the N-th memory cell in the range.
If P4==0 then register P3 holds a blob constructed by MakeRecord. If P4>0 then register P3 is the first of P4 registers that form an unpacked record.
Cursor P1 is on an index btree. If the record identified by P3 and P4 is not the prefix of any entry in P1 then a jump is made to P2. If P1 does contain an entry whose prefix matches the P3/P4 record then control falls through to the next instruction and P1 is left pointing at the matching entry.
This operation leaves the cursor in a state where it cannot be advanced in either direction. In other words, the Next and Prev opcodes do not work after this operation.
