mirror of
https://github.com/0xb100d/manifestos.git
synced 2025-12-17 08:04:20 +01:00
Create lawvstechnology
This commit is contained in:
56
lawvstechnology
Normal file
56
lawvstechnology
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
|
||||
Subject: law vs technology
|
||||
From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
|
||||
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 13:32:02 -0800
|
||||
Priority: normal
|
||||
Reply-To: weidai@eskimo.com
|
||||
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
|
||||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
||||
|
||||
Recently there's been a great deal of discussion on this list
|
||||
about upcoming legislations (HR666 S314 etc.). Maybe it's time
|
||||
to step back a little and look at the bigger picture. I've
|
||||
been assuming (perhaps incorrectly) for some time that most
|
||||
cypherpunks hold a belief somewhat like the following:
|
||||
|
||||
There has never been a government that didn't sooner or later
|
||||
try to reduce the freedom of its subjects and gain more control
|
||||
over them, and there probably never will be one. Therefore,
|
||||
instead of trying to convince our current government not to
|
||||
try, we'll develop the technology (e.g., remailers and ecash)
|
||||
that will make it impossible for the government to succeed.
|
||||
Efforts to influence the government (e.g., lobbying and
|
||||
propaganda) are important only in so far as to delay its
|
||||
attempted crackdown long enough for the technology to mature
|
||||
and come into wide use.
|
||||
|
||||
But even if you do not believe the above is true, think about
|
||||
it this way: If you have a certain amount of time to spend on
|
||||
advancing the cause of greater personal privacy (or freedom, or
|
||||
cryptoanarchy, or whatever), can you do it better by using the
|
||||
time to learn about cryptography and develop the tools to
|
||||
protect privacy, or by convincing your government not to invade
|
||||
your privacy? I argue that since there are many more people
|
||||
doing the former (EFF, CPSR, etc) than latter, that you'd be
|
||||
more effective if you spent the time on the former.
|
||||
|
||||
Wei Dai
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
||||
Version: 2.6.2
|
||||
|
||||
iQCVAwUBLzvayTl0sXKgdnV5AQEBvAP+MqsGer5pg2xM6+pYG7DgCSttUyAoG8I6
|
||||
Hm/atFUdRauZ1WREpi3XTXEmNgT9m+QuON5+6rnUrfkizAdjr9EPFnXxMa8am8TZ
|
||||
W7iQBuKb/KktbClbQyKzndeAOQ3oIOi4ahdn5eseOCWc3wX/WcjR6w9WJ6yPWoTJ
|
||||
6fcglCGgo/8=
|
||||
=Pc1V
|
||||
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
||||
|
||||
E-mail: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com> URL: "http://www.eskimo.com/~weidai"
|
||||
=================== Exponential Increase of Complexity ===================
|
||||
--> singularity --> atoms --> macromolecules --> biological evolution
|
||||
--> central nervous systems --> symbolic communication --> homo sapiens
|
||||
--> digital computers --> internetworking --> close-coupled automation
|
||||
--> broadband brain-to-net connections --> artificial intelligence
|
||||
--> distributed consciousness --> group minds --> ? ? ?
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user