I was wondering why the workflow never published, turns out we were triggering on
branch pushes only, not tags. So the branch would get pushed, but the tag is pushed
afterwards, and thus not triggering.
Requires us to update to latest lnproto which is now using the most up
to date python-bitcoinlib, as well as updating our python lock files
(which pin the grpcio deps, because of locking problems h/t @cdecker)
Over time, it has cost us more developer cycles than it has gained.
It has hidden intermittant bugs, and allowed cruft to accumulate:
when we eventually tried to figure out what was going wrong, the
actual change which caused it was now stale and forgotten.
This was a particular bane during the connectd rewrite, and I
worked through some issues which had occurred before, but were not
more likely.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I have no idea why someone else owns the directory suddenly, but all git
commands fail. Workaround as suggested by the error message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Mostly comments and docs: some places are actually paths, which
I have avoided changing. We may migrate them slowly, particularly
when they're user-visible.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
check-dbstmts was just running the normal pytest, AFAICT:
```
export TEST_CHECK_DBSTMTS=0
+ TEST_CHECK_DBSTMTS=0
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Setting VALGRIND=1 actually does nothing here; reduce it to two cases,
covering gcc and clang, sqlite3 and postgres.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Add an extra run configuration for the proto-tests.
Proto-tests require DEVELOPER=1; enabling EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES=1
by default ensures that experimental additions are automatically put
under test also.
It's been causing me quite some headache, and I don't see the point in
jumping through the hoops for something that can be trivially fixed by
having the required build tools.
A new target `check-gen-updated` to verify that all derived/generated
files that were modified were also checked in. This is used on CI to
check, and is not added to `check` since it'll complain on dirty
trees, i.e., before the devs check in their changes.
Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
We split into quick smoke-tests, normal-tests, and valgrind-tests. The
first provides a quick-abort preventing overusing resources on what
will be a failed run anyway.
