When adding their HTLCs, it needs all the information. When failing,
it needs the id as key and the failure reason. When fulfilling, it
needs the id and payment preimage.
It also needs to know when we have received an revoke_and_ack or a
commitment_signed, to place in the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We alternated between using a sha256 and using a privkey, but there are
numerous places where we have a random 32 bytes which are neither.
This fixes many of them (plus, struct privkey is now defined in terms of
struct secret).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This lets us link HTLCs from one peer to another; but for the moment it
simply means we can adjust balance when an HTLC is fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
