aljaz/lightning
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/aljazceru/lightning.git synced 2025-12-19 07:04:22 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

pytest: fix flakiness in test_channel_reenable.

Browse Source 
In one case, the channel_update which we expected to activate the channel
from l2 was suppressed as redundant.  This is certainly valid, so just
check the results.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
Rusty Russell
2018-08-14 09:56:03 +09:30
parent 700a0d702d
commit b379bec4e4
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
tests/test_connection.py
View File

@@ -795,14 +795,13 @@ def test_channel_reenable(node_factory):
wait_for(lambda: [c['active'] for c in l1.rpc.listchannels()['channels']] == [True, True]) wait_for(lambda: [c['active'] for c in l1.rpc.listchannels()['channels']] == [True, True])
# Restart l2, will cause l1 to reconnect # Restart l2, will cause l1 to reconnect
l2.restart() l2.stop()
wait_for(lambda: [c['active'] for c in l1.rpc.listchannels()['channels']] == [False, False])
l2.start()
# Now they should sync and re-establish again # Updates may be suppressed if redundant; just test results.
l1.daemon.wait_for_logs(['Received channel_update for channel \\d+:1:1.1.',
'Received channel_update for channel \\d+:1:1.0.'])
l2.daemon.wait_for_logs(['Received channel_update for channel \\d+:1:1.1.',
'Received channel_update for channel \\d+:1:1.0.'])
wait_for(lambda: [c['active'] for c in l1.rpc.listchannels()['channels']] == [True, True]) wait_for(lambda: [c['active'] for c in l1.rpc.listchannels()['channels']] == [True, True])
wait_for(lambda: [c['active'] for c in l2.rpc.listchannels()['channels']] == [True, True])
@unittest.skipIf(not DEVELOPER, "needs DEVELOPER=1") @unittest.skipIf(not DEVELOPER, "needs DEVELOPER=1")