From aa62d79db24785223358d07c985ae277e1eeb1bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:50:06 +0930
Subject: [PATCH] subd: fix false positive if we're inside a subd_req.

We're going to call out to subds for memleak detection, and the disabler
looks like a memleak if we're inside a callback.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
---
 lightningd/subd.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lightningd/subd.c b/lightningd/subd.c
index 0db43ea96..4f7f791f6 100644
--- a/lightningd/subd.c
+++ b/lightningd/subd.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <common/crypto_state.h>
 #include <common/gen_peer_status_wire.h>
 #include <common/gen_status_wire.h>
+#include <common/memleak.h>
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <lightningd/lightningd.h>
@@ -91,7 +92,7 @@ static void add_req(const tal_t *ctx,
 	 * case where ctx is freed between request and reply.  Hence this
 	 * trick. */
 	if (ctx) {
-		sr->disabler = tal(ctx, char);
+		sr->disabler = notleak(tal(ctx, char));
 		tal_add_destructor2(sr->disabler, disable_cb, sr);
 	} else
 		sr->disabler = NULL;