From 8f16b0593c25e6673fe989387f3df65e2f7a619c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rusty Russell Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 09:44:10 +0930 Subject: [PATCH] lightingd: fix minfee when we're ignoring limits. Presumably we still want to insist that this have *some* chance to propagate. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell --- lightningd/closing_control.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lightningd/closing_control.c b/lightningd/closing_control.c index 93d2602fd..b806c15c0 100644 --- a/lightningd/closing_control.c +++ b/lightningd/closing_control.c @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ void peer_start_closingd(struct channel *channel, struct peer_fd *peer_fd) min_feerate = channel->closing_feerate_range[0]; max_feerate = &channel->closing_feerate_range[1]; } else if (channel->ignore_fee_limits || ld->config.ignore_fee_limits) { - min_feerate = 1; + min_feerate = 253; tal_free(max_feerate); max_feerate = tal(tmpctx, u32); *max_feerate = 0xFFFFFFFF;