From 284bd7de0caf4eed2bfe96f92a2fefc09bf8e6b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:27:11 +0930
Subject: [PATCH] pytest: fix flaky test_excluded_adjacent_routehint

We weren't actually waiting until l3 got the channel_update from l2,
so it might not be able to create the routehint.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
---
 tests/test_pay.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/test_pay.py b/tests/test_pay.py
index 5fbd82032..a0cec72c6 100644
--- a/tests/test_pay.py
+++ b/tests/test_pay.py
@@ -2953,7 +2953,7 @@ def test_excluded_adjacent_routehint(node_factory, bitcoind):
     l1, l2, l3 = node_factory.line_graph(3)
 
     # We'll be forced to use routehint, since we don't know about l3.
-    wait_for(lambda: l3.channel_state(l2) == 'CHANNELD_NORMAL')
+    wait_for(lambda: len(l3.rpc.listchannels(source=l2.info['id'])['channels']) == 1)
     inv = l3.rpc.invoice(10**3, "lbl", "desc", exposeprivatechannels=l2.get_channel_scid(l3))
 
     # This will make it reject the routehint.