mirror of
https://github.com/aljazceru/lightning.git
synced 2026-02-23 15:04:19 +01:00
packets.c: accept_pkt_* should do less state-mangling.
Move other logic into caller, but it's not complete (it still needs to check some things, and still records some results). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
254
daemon/packets.c
254
daemon/packets.c
@@ -269,7 +269,9 @@ Pkt *pkt_err_unexpected(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Process various packets: return an error packet on failure. */
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_open(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_open(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt,
|
||||
struct sha256 *revocation_hash,
|
||||
struct sha256 *next_revocation_hash)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rel_locktime locktime;
|
||||
const OpenChannel *o = pkt->open;
|
||||
@@ -305,49 +307,8 @@ Pkt *accept_pkt_open(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
o->final_key, &peer->remote.finalkey))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Bad finalkey");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set up their commit info now: rest gets done in setup_first_commit
|
||||
* once anchor is established. */
|
||||
peer->remote.commit = new_commit_info(peer);
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(o->revocation_hash, &peer->remote.commit->revocation_hash);
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(o->next_revocation_hash,
|
||||
&peer->remote.next_revocation_hash);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Witness script for anchor. */
|
||||
peer->anchor.witnessscript
|
||||
= bitcoin_redeem_2of2(peer, peer->dstate->secpctx,
|
||||
&peer->local.commitkey,
|
||||
&peer->remote.commitkey);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Save and check signature. */
|
||||
static Pkt *check_and_save_commit_sig(struct peer *peer,
|
||||
struct commit_info *ci,
|
||||
const Signature *pb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bitcoin_signature *sig = tal(ci, struct bitcoin_signature);
|
||||
|
||||
assert(!ci->sig);
|
||||
sig->stype = SIGHASH_ALL;
|
||||
if (!proto_to_signature(peer->dstate->secpctx, pb, &sig->sig))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Malformed signature");
|
||||
|
||||
log_debug(peer->log, "Checking sig for %u/%u msatoshis, %zu/%zu htlcs",
|
||||
ci->cstate->side[OURS].pay_msat,
|
||||
ci->cstate->side[THEIRS].pay_msat,
|
||||
tal_count(ci->cstate->side[OURS].htlcs),
|
||||
tal_count(ci->cstate->side[THEIRS].htlcs));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Their sig should sign our commit tx. */
|
||||
if (!check_tx_sig(peer->dstate->secpctx,
|
||||
ci->tx, 0,
|
||||
NULL, 0,
|
||||
peer->anchor.witnessscript,
|
||||
&peer->remote.commitkey,
|
||||
sig))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Bad signature");
|
||||
|
||||
ci->sig = sig;
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(o->revocation_hash, revocation_hash);
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(o->next_revocation_hash, next_revocation_hash);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -362,18 +323,22 @@ Pkt *accept_pkt_anchor(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(a->txid, &peer->anchor.txid.sha);
|
||||
peer->anchor.index = a->output_index;
|
||||
peer->anchor.satoshis = a->amount;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!setup_first_commit(peer))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Insufficient funds for fee");
|
||||
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_open_commit_sig(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_open_commit_sig(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt,
|
||||
struct bitcoin_signature **sig)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const OpenCommitSig *s = pkt->open_commit_sig;
|
||||
struct signature signature;
|
||||
|
||||
return check_and_save_commit_sig(peer, peer->local.commit, s->sig);
|
||||
if (!proto_to_signature(peer->dstate->secpctx, s->sig, &signature))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Malformed signature");
|
||||
|
||||
*sig = tal(peer, struct bitcoin_signature);
|
||||
(*sig)->stype = SIGHASH_ALL;
|
||||
(*sig)->sig = signature;
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_open_complete(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
@@ -385,13 +350,11 @@ Pkt *accept_pkt_open_complete(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
* We add changes to both our staging cstate (as they did when they sent
|
||||
* it) and theirs (as they will when we ack it).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_htlc_add(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_htlc_add(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt, struct htlc **h)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const UpdateAddHtlc *u = pkt->update_add_htlc;
|
||||
struct sha256 rhash;
|
||||
struct abs_locktime expiry;
|
||||
struct htlc *htlc;
|
||||
union htlc_staging stage;
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
@@ -430,29 +393,10 @@ Pkt *accept_pkt_htlc_add(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ...and the receiving node MUST add the HTLC addition to the
|
||||
* unacked changeset for its local commitment. */
|
||||
htlc = peer_new_htlc(peer, u->id, u->amount_msat, &rhash,
|
||||
abs_locktime_to_blocks(&expiry),
|
||||
u->route->info.data, u->route->info.len,
|
||||
NULL, RCVD_ADD_HTLC);
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A node MUST NOT offer `amount_msat` it cannot pay for in
|
||||
* the remote commitment transaction at the current `fee_rate` (see
|
||||
* "Fee Calculation" ). A node SHOULD fail the connection if
|
||||
* this occurs.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!cstate_add_htlc(peer->local.staging_cstate, htlc, THEIRS)) {
|
||||
tal_free(htlc);
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Cannot afford %"PRIu64" milli-satoshis"
|
||||
" in our commitment tx",
|
||||
u->amount_msat);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
stage.add.add = HTLC_ADD;
|
||||
stage.add.htlc = htlc;
|
||||
add_unacked(&peer->local, &stage);
|
||||
|
||||
*h = peer_new_htlc(peer, u->id, u->amount_msat, &rhash,
|
||||
abs_locktime_to_blocks(&expiry),
|
||||
u->route->info.data, u->route->info.len,
|
||||
NULL, RCVD_ADD_HTLC);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -476,43 +420,27 @@ static Pkt *find_commited_htlc(struct peer *peer, uint64_t id,
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_htlc_fail(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_htlc_fail(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt, struct htlc **h)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const UpdateFailHtlc *f = pkt->update_fail_htlc;
|
||||
struct htlc *htlc;
|
||||
Pkt *err;
|
||||
union htlc_staging stage;
|
||||
|
||||
err = find_commited_htlc(peer, f->id, &htlc);
|
||||
err = find_commited_htlc(peer, f->id, h);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
/* FIXME: Save reason. */
|
||||
|
||||
cstate_fail_htlc(peer->local.staging_cstate, htlc, OURS);
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ... and the receiving node MUST add the HTLC fulfill/fail
|
||||
* to the unacked changeset for its local commitment.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
stage.fail.fail = HTLC_FAIL;
|
||||
stage.fail.htlc = htlc;
|
||||
add_unacked(&peer->local, &stage);
|
||||
htlc_changestate(htlc, SENT_ADD_ACK_REVOCATION, RCVD_REMOVE_HTLC);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_htlc_fulfill(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_htlc_fulfill(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt, struct htlc **h)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const UpdateFulfillHtlc *f = pkt->update_fulfill_htlc;
|
||||
struct htlc *htlc;
|
||||
struct sha256 rhash;
|
||||
struct rval r;
|
||||
Pkt *err;
|
||||
union htlc_staging stage;
|
||||
|
||||
err = find_commited_htlc(peer, f->id, &htlc);
|
||||
err = find_commited_htlc(peer, f->id, h);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -520,102 +448,34 @@ Pkt *accept_pkt_htlc_fulfill(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
proto_to_rval(f->r, &r);
|
||||
sha256(&rhash, &r, sizeof(r));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!structeq(&rhash, &htlc->rhash))
|
||||
if (!structeq(&rhash, &(*h)->rhash))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Invalid r for %"PRIu64, f->id);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We can relay this upstream immediately. */
|
||||
our_htlc_fulfilled(peer, htlc, &r);
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ... and the receiving node MUST add the HTLC fulfill/fail
|
||||
* to the unacked changeset for its local commitment.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cstate_fulfill_htlc(peer->local.staging_cstate, htlc, OURS);
|
||||
htlc_changestate(htlc, SENT_ADD_ACK_REVOCATION, RCVD_REMOVE_HTLC);
|
||||
|
||||
stage.fulfill.fulfill = HTLC_FULFILL;
|
||||
stage.fulfill.htlc = htlc;
|
||||
stage.fulfill.r = r;
|
||||
add_unacked(&peer->local, &stage);
|
||||
assert(!(*h)->r);
|
||||
(*h)->r = tal_dup(*h, struct rval, &r);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_commit(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_commit(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt,
|
||||
struct bitcoin_signature *sig)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const UpdateCommit *c = pkt->update_commit;
|
||||
Pkt *err;
|
||||
struct commit_info *ci = new_commit_info(peer);
|
||||
static const struct state_table changes[] = {
|
||||
{ RCVD_ADD_REVOCATION, RCVD_ADD_ACK_COMMIT },
|
||||
{ RCVD_REMOVE_HTLC, RCVD_REMOVE_COMMIT },
|
||||
{ RCVD_ADD_HTLC, RCVD_ADD_COMMIT },
|
||||
{ RCVD_REMOVE_REVOCATION, RCVD_REMOVE_ACK_COMMIT }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A node MUST NOT send an `update_commit` message which does
|
||||
* not include any updates.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!htlcs_changestate(peer, changes, ARRAY_SIZE(changes)))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Empty commit");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Create new commit info for this commit tx. */
|
||||
ci->prev = peer->local.commit;
|
||||
ci->commit_num = ci->prev->commit_num + 1;
|
||||
ci->revocation_hash = peer->local.next_revocation_hash;
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A receiving node MUST apply all local acked and unacked
|
||||
* changes except unacked fee changes to the local commitment
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* (We already applied them to staging_cstate as we went) */
|
||||
ci->cstate = copy_cstate(ci, peer->local.staging_cstate);
|
||||
ci->tx = create_commit_tx(ci, peer, &ci->revocation_hash,
|
||||
ci->cstate, LOCAL, &ci->map);
|
||||
bitcoin_txid(ci->tx, &ci->txid);
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A node MUST NOT send an `update_commit` message which does
|
||||
* not include any updates.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ci->prev->cstate->changes == ci->cstate->changes)
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Empty commit");
|
||||
|
||||
err = check_and_save_commit_sig(peer, ci, c->sig);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Switch to the new commitment. */
|
||||
peer->local.commit = ci;
|
||||
peer_get_revocation_hash(peer, ci->commit_num + 1,
|
||||
&peer->local.next_revocation_hash);
|
||||
|
||||
sig->stype = SIGHASH_ALL;
|
||||
if (!proto_to_signature(peer->dstate->secpctx, c->sig, &sig->sig))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "Malformed signature");
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool check_preimage(const Sha256Hash *preimage, const struct sha256 *hash)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sha256 h;
|
||||
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(preimage, &h);
|
||||
sha256(&h, &h, sizeof(h));
|
||||
return structeq(&h, hash);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_revocation(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
Pkt *accept_pkt_revocation(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt,
|
||||
struct commit_info *ci)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const UpdateRevocation *r = pkt->update_revocation;
|
||||
struct commit_info *ci = peer->remote.commit->prev;
|
||||
static const struct state_table changes[] = {
|
||||
{ SENT_ADD_COMMIT, RCVD_ADD_REVOCATION },
|
||||
{ SENT_REMOVE_ACK_COMMIT, RCVD_REMOVE_ACK_REVOCATION },
|
||||
{ SENT_ADD_ACK_COMMIT, RCVD_ADD_ACK_REVOCATION },
|
||||
{ SENT_REMOVE_COMMIT, RCVD_REMOVE_REVOCATION }
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct sha256 h;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(!ci->revocation_preimage);
|
||||
ci->revocation_preimage = tal(ci, struct sha256);
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(r->revocation_preimage, ci->revocation_preimage);
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
@@ -623,45 +483,19 @@ Pkt *accept_pkt_revocation(struct peer *peer, const Pkt *pkt)
|
||||
* SHA256 hash of `revocation_preimage` matches the previous commitment
|
||||
* transaction, and MUST fail if it does not.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!check_preimage(r->revocation_preimage, &ci->revocation_hash))
|
||||
sha256(&h, ci->revocation_preimage, sizeof(*ci->revocation_preimage));
|
||||
if (!structeq(&h, &ci->revocation_hash))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "complete preimage incorrect");
|
||||
|
||||
/* They're revoking the previous one. */
|
||||
assert(!ci->revocation_preimage);
|
||||
ci->revocation_preimage = tal(ci, struct sha256);
|
||||
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(r->revocation_preimage, ci->revocation_preimage);
|
||||
|
||||
// save revocation preimages in shachain
|
||||
if (!shachain_add_hash(&peer->their_preimages, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFL - ci->commit_num, ci->revocation_preimage))
|
||||
if (!shachain_add_hash(&peer->their_preimages,
|
||||
0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFL - ci->commit_num,
|
||||
ci->revocation_preimage))
|
||||
return pkt_err(peer, "preimage not next in shachain");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Save next revocation hash. */
|
||||
proto_to_sha256(r->next_revocation_hash,
|
||||
&peer->remote.next_revocation_hash);
|
||||
|
||||
/* BOLT #2:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The receiver of `update_revocation`... MUST add the remote
|
||||
* unacked changes to the set of local acked changes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
add_acked_changes(&peer->local.commit->acked_changes, ci->unacked_changes);
|
||||
apply_changeset(peer, &peer->local, OURS,
|
||||
ci->unacked_changes,
|
||||
tal_count(ci->unacked_changes));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!htlcs_changestate(peer, changes, ARRAY_SIZE(changes)))
|
||||
fatal("Revocation received but we made empty commitment?");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Should never examine these again. */
|
||||
ci->unacked_changes = tal_free(ci->unacked_changes);
|
||||
|
||||
/* That revocation has committed them to changes in the current commitment.
|
||||
* Any acked changes come from our commitment, so those are now committed
|
||||
* by both of us.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
peer_both_committed_to(peer, ci->acked_changes, THEIRS);
|
||||
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user