The hub tool is deprecated. Convert this script to use the
official GitHub CLI gh instead of hub.
A couple of adjustments had to be made :
- the notes.md temporary file is moved to ${tmp_dir} in order to silent gh,
otherwise it complains about an untracked file,
- title of a PR no longer goes to the notes.md file since gh requires the
title to be passed with a dedicated --title option.
Fixes#8303
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
We don't want to mess with the official repo when testing a change
in the release scripts. Adapt `update-repository-version.sh` to
be able to use an alternate repo just like `tag_repos.sh` already
does.
This means that the following command :
$ OWNER="$SOME_ORG" ./update-repository-version.sh -p "$NEW_VERSION" "$BRANCH"
will only create a PR in this repo :
http://github.com/$SOME_ORG/kata-containers.git
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
This is needed in order to properly run the CIs in branches that are not
the main one, as the kata-deploy.yaml file on those branches do not have
the `latest` tag, but rather the latest stable release.
Fixes: #8274
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
As we've moved all the tests to the `kata-containers` repo, the `tests`
repo will become a read-only repo.
Fixes: #8200
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Shell expands `*"rc"*` to the top-level `src` directory. This results
in comparing a version with a directory name. This doesn't make sense
and causes the script to choose the wrong branch of the `if`.
The intent of the check is actually to detect `rc` in the version.
Fixes: #5283
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
During the release of 2.4.0-rc0 @egernst noticed an incositency in the
way we handle release tags, as release candidates are being taken as
"stable" releases, while both the kata-deploy tests and the release
action consider this as "latest".
Ideally we should have our own tag for "release candidate", but that's
something that could and should be discussed more extensively outside of
the scope of this quick fix.
For now, let's align the code generating the PR for bumping the release
with what we already do as part of the release action and kata-deploy
test, and tag "-rc" as latest, regardless of which branch it's coming
from.
Fixes: #3847
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
`grep`ing by a specific output, in a specific language, is quite fragile
and could easily break `hub`. For now, let's work this around following
James' suggestion of setting `LC_ALL=C LANG=C` when calling `hub`.
> **Note**: I don't think we should invest much time on fixing `hub`
> usage, as it'll be soon replaced by `gh`, see:
> https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/3083
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
When branching the "stable-x.y" branch, we need to do some quite
specific changes to kata-deploy / kata-cleanup files, such as:
* changing the tags from "latest" to "stable-x.y".
* removing the kata-deploy / kata-cleanup stable files.
However, after the branching is done, we need to get the `main` repo to
its original state, with the kata-deploy / kata-cleanup using the
"latest" tag, and with the stable files present there, and this commit
ensures that, during the release process, a new PR is automatically
created with these changes.
Fixes: #3069
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Rather than doing the kata-deploy changes as part of the release bump
commit, let's split those on its own changes, as it will both make the
life of the reviewer less confusing and also allows us to start
preparing the field for a possible automated revert of these changes,
whenever it becomes needed.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Similarly to what was done for the yaml files, let's use a var for
representing the registry where our images will be pushed to and avoid
repetition and too long lines.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Instead of always writing the full path of some files, let's just create
some vars and avoid both repetition (which is quite error prone) and too
long lines (which makes the file not so easy to read).
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We can simplify the code a little bit, as at least now we group common
operationr together. Hopefully this will improve the maintainability
and the readability of the code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The comments were mentioning kata-deploy-base files while it really
should mention kata-deploy-stable files.
While here, I've also added a missing '"' to one of the tags.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's teach our `update-repository-version.sh` script to properly update
the kata-deploy tags on both kata-deploy and kata-cleanup yaml files.
The 3 scenarios that we're dealing with, based on which branch we're
targetting, are:
```
1) [main] ------> [main] NO-OP
"alpha0" "alpha1"
+----------------+----------------+
| from | to |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
kata-deploy | "latest" | "latest" |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
kata-deploy-base | "stable | "stable" |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
2) [main] ------> [stable] Update kata-deploy and
"alpha2" "rc0" get rid of kata-deploy-base
+----------------+----------------+
| from | to |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
kata-deploy | "latest" | "rc0" |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
kata-deploy-base | "stable" | REMOVED |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
3) [stable] ------> [stable] Update kata-deploy
"x.y.z" "x.y.(z+1)"
+----------------+----------------+
| from | to |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
kata-deploy | "x.y.z" | "x.y.(z+1)" |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
kata-deploy-base | NON-EXISTENT | NON-EXISTENT |
-----------------+----------------+----------------+
```
And we can easily cover those 3 cases only with the information about
the "${target_branch}" and the "${new_version}", where:
* case 1) if "${target_branch}" is "main" *and* "${new_version}"
contains "alpha", do nothing
* case 2) if "${target_branch}" is "main" *and* "${new_version}"
contains "rc":
* change the kata-deploy & kata-cleanup tags from "latest" to
"${new_version}".
* delete the kata-deploy-stable & kata-cleanup-stable files.
* case 3) if the "${target_branch}" contains "stable":
* change the kata-deploy & kata-cleanup tags from "${current_version}"
to "${new_version}".
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
Let's teach `update-repository-version.sh` to automatically bump the
version of the kata-deploy images to be used within that release, when
running against the `kata-containers` repo.
Fixes: #1665
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
