link-self-contained is not supported on ppc64le rust target.
Hence, do not pass it while building virtiofsd.
Fixes: #6195
Signed-off-by: Amulyam24 <amulmek1@in.ibm.com>
Let's do this as the component name will be re-used later on, when we
start checking whether a cached component needs to be rebuilt or not.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This is used in several parts of the code, and can have a single
declaration as part of the `lib.sh` file, which is already imported by
all the places where it's used.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The compile option link-self-contained=yes asks rustc to use
C library startup object files that come with the compiler,
which are not available on the target s390x-unknown-linux-gnu.
A build does not contain any startup files leading to a
broken executable entry point (causing segmentation fault).
Fixes: #5522
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
This, combined with the effort of caching builder images *and* only
performing the build itself inside the builder images, is the very first
step for reproducible builds for the project.
Reproducible builds are quite important when we talk about Confidential
Containers, as users may want to verify the content used / provided by
the CSPs, and this is the first step towards that direction.
Fixes: #5517
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We need to do that in order to avoid trying to use the image in an
architecture which is not yet supported (such as trying to use the x6_64
image on a s390x machine)
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's add the needed infra for only building and pushing the virtiofsd
builder image to the Kata Containers' quay.io registry.
Fixes: #5480
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's first try to pull a pre-existing image, instead of building our
own, to be used as a builder image for the virtiofsd.
This will save us some CI time.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's ensure we're building virtiofsd with a specific toolchain that's
known to not cause any issues, instead of always using the latest one.
On each bump of the virtiofsd, we'll make sure to adjust this according
to what's been used by the virtiofsd community.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
When moving to building the CI artefacts using the kata-deploy scripts,
we've noticed that the build would fail on any machine where the tarball
wasn't officially provided.
This happens as rust is missing from the 1st layer container. However,
it's a very common practice to leave the 1st layer container with the
minimum possible dependencies and install whatever is needed for
building a specific component in a 2nd layer container, which virtiofsd
never had.
In this commit we introduce the second layer containers (yes,
comtainers), one for building virtiofsd using musl, and one for building
virtiofsd using glibc. The reason for taking this approach was to
actually simplify the scripts and avoid building the dependencies
(libseccomp, libcap-ng) using musl libc.
Fixes: #5425
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7e5941c578)
When moving to building the CI artefacts using the kata-deploy scripts,
we've noticed that the build would fail on any machine where the tarball
wasn't officially provided.
This happens as rust is missing from the 1st layer container. However,
it's a very common practice to leave the 1st layer container with the
minimum possible dependencies and install whatever is needed for
building a specific component in a 2nd layer container, which virtiofsd
never had.
In this commit we introduce the second layer containers (yes,
comtainers), one for building virtiofsd using musl, and one for building
virtiofsd using glibc. The reason for taking this approach was to
actually simplify the scripts and avoid building the dependencies
(libseccomp, libcap-ng) using musl libc.
Fixes: #5425
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Based on @fidencio's opoinon,
On Arm: static build virtiofsd using musl lib;
on ppc64 & s390: static build virtiofsd using gnu lib;
Fixes: #4258
Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Right now this is very much x86_64 specific, but I'd like to count on
the maintainers of the other architectures to expand it.
Also, the name as it's now may be misleading, as we're actually only
pulling the binary that's statically built using `musl` and released as
part of virtiofsd official releases. But we'll need to build it for the
other architectures, thus I'm following the naming of the scripts used
by the other components.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
