diff --git a/meeting/meeting_may_5_2021.md b/meeting/meeting_may_5_2021.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0ecdf05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting/meeting_may_5_2021.md
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# May 5th (7 PM CST)/6th (9 AM JST) Meeting 2021
+
+1 Year Anniversary of Formal DLC Spec Meetings!!
+
+## Individual Updates (Sync)
+
+* **#Query(Nadav)**
+  * Adaptor sigs in bitcoin-s
+  * test vector work
+  * dlc data structuring
+* **#Query(Tibo)**
+  * Upgrading serialization
+  * Adaptor Sig bindings in rust-secp256k1
+* **#Query(Lloyd)**
+  * mailing list post from lloyd
+    * https://mailmanlists.org/pipermail/dlc-dev/2021-April/000069.html
+* **#Query(Chris)**
+  * dlc wallet for btc 2021
+* **#Query(Antoine)**
+  * reviewed multi-oracle
+* **#Query(Jesse)**
+  * FROST work
+* **#Query(Matt)**
+  * node-dlc work
+* **#Query(all)**
+
+## Specification Writing
+
+**#Status_Update_Interrupt**
+
+* Multi-oracle support
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/128
+  * Thoughts on merging or changes needed?
+    * Tibo says fine to merge
+      * Higher level follow-up PR suggested
+* Hyperbola curve piece support
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/144
+  * Thoughts on merging or changes needed?
+    * Good enough for merge
+* Fraud proofs
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/152
+  * Do people want this? Or maybe in some other form? Better merged or dropped?
+    * Keep it open but de-prioritized, we'll just leave it for now
+* If anyone is interested it would be nice to document loss-of-fund vectors
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/issues/132
+* ECDSA Adaptor Signature Specification
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/114
+  * Is this missing something or good to merge?
+    * Good to merge
+* Draft Updating P2P message serialization to include sub-types, optional fields, tlv streams
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/163
+  * **#Discussion**
+    * Every tiny thing had a big type associated with it and this will simplify things and make them more clear and extensible, current LN is too restrictive
+    * Open call for review!
+  * Also adds protocol versioning to offer message
+    * **#Discussion**
+* Mutual Close Message
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/issues/161
+  * Current protocol has no cooperative close
+    * Could send PSBT, but this isn't ideal
+  * This is for after a funding tx is confirmed
+    * CET locktime hasn't been reached
+  * Extra input to mutual close to avoid free option, and in the future we will introduce revocation mechanism
+* Nadav needs to make compatibility test vectors
+
+## Oracle Specifications
+
+**#Status_Update**
+
+* Oracle JSON format
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/150
+  * Thoughts on merging?
+  * Leave it open, good merge pending final feedback
+* Client-side oracle validation specification
+  * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/120
+  * Thoughts on merging?
+  * good for merge
+* [Oracle Event Timestamps Discussion](https://mailmanlists.org/pipermail/dlc-dev/2021-February/000015.html)
+  * Proposal to replace u32 timestamp on `oracle_event` with a TLV which can either be `u32 : expected_time` or `u32 : earliest_expected_time, u32 : latest_expected_time`.
+  * Is there consensus on this moving forward so that a PR can be opened or still lingering thoughts out there?
+  * Cool with this approach, will open a PR
+    * Also need to separate oracle key into two parts, sign with nonce keys
+
+## Oracle Attestation Research
+
+**#Status_Update**
+
+* **#Query(Lloyd)**
+  * paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/350.pdf
+    * Compress s values in signatures with R values present
+    * This would fix our aggregation woes
+    * May be very inefficient (needs a multiplication for every CET)
+    * But hey, at least it is theoretically possible!
\ No newline at end of file