From 84b4cfc8101a2656ce50adb23b953f311e2017d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nkohen Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 12:36:14 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Added meeting directory and first meeting doc --- meeting/meeting_may_6_2020.md | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meeting/meeting_may_6_2020.md diff --git a/meeting/meeting_may_6_2020.md b/meeting/meeting_may_6_2020.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ac8c628 --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting/meeting_may_6_2020.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +# May 6th (7 PM CST)/7th (9 AM JST) Meeting + +## On-boarding Contributors + +* Adding intro doc (should this go into the top of readme instead?) + * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/issues/16 +* Add new blog posts (lightning dlc related) to resources page +* Anything else for the resources page? + +## Rust DLC + +* Where should code go? + * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/issues/17 +* Initial DLC functions + * https://github.com/p2pderivatives/rust-dlc/pull/1 +* Goals for first DLC project on rust-lightning? + * https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-lightning/issues/605 +* LN Hackathon? + +## Oracle Standards + +* Signature serialization standard (tagged hashes?) + * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/issues/21 +* Signing numbers (prices) + +## Tweaked Public Key/Point Computation for CETs + +* Privacy against mempool observer + * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/issues/35 +* Is this relevant? https://github.com/LNP-BP/LNPBPs/blob/master/lnpbp-0001.md + +## Re-writing Specification (to be BOLT-like) + +* Transactions.md + * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/14 +* Make sure to define everything before use. Maybe a glossary? + * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/issues/29 +* Perhaps we want a layered design picture first, and then make spec modules follow this + +## Interoperability and Testing + +* Coming up with test vectors for edge cases + * https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/issues/30 +* What do we need to do to become inter-operable? + * Low R signing + * Schnorr/BIP 340 updates + * Fee stuff? + * Any diffs left after that? +